Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Alien Arena Reloaded - Renderer Improvements, Etc

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,413

    Default Alien Arena Reloaded - Renderer Improvements, Etc

    Phoronix: Alien Arena Reloaded - Renderer Improvements, Etc

    At the end of June I mentioned Alien Arena: Reloaded would be released next week. Today in fact that was made a reality with the release of this open-source CRX-engine-powered game...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEzNDU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    154

    Default Screenshot dump




  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    429

    Default

    would be cool if it had a team fortress like mode but with the aliens

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by madjr View Post
    would be cool if it had a team fortress like mode but with the aliens
    Interesting you mention that. The Team Core Assault mode is going to get some work done on it in the future, and one of the ideas I was pondering was to allow teams to build defensive items, structures, etc.

    I'd be remiss also if I didn't take the time to mention the new Mind Eraser weapon in this release. Too often we(and other fast-paced FPS) get accused of not expanding the gameplay in any fashion. We decided on taking a step in that direction with our base deathmatch mode. It's not a drastic change, but it's something that will enhance the play, and add some more strategy to it. It's best explained in this video:


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    8

    Default

    It should be noted that this version contains corrections to the test code, so benchmarking with Phoronix Test Suite is now possible. Not ready for prime time, but there is a crude beginning in our SVN repository. Hoping to refine this in the future; input (preferably constructive) is welcome.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Running wonderfully on high settings on my HD4850 with r600g .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,050

    Default

    When will this hit Desura then?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamish Wilson View Post
    When will this hit Desura then?
    I find this curious. Could you make a sales pitch on why it (or any other indie game) should?

    It's not like Desura has a huge audience, it's more trouble to post updates to more places, etc.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    154

    Default

    I updated the standalone installers on Desura, they are taking their sweet time to approve.

    I agree though, Desura is a bit of a pain to work with, heck, I can't even figure out where to change that line where it's saying version 7.51 is the latest.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    8

    Default

    First, to be clear, I really like the idea of Desura and its support for Linux. Looking forward to the day when Steam supports Linux. I have a Steam account and a non-gamer, but somewhat playable, Windows laptop. Lately, have been running Steam and TESV:Skyrim on WINE on my Linux machine (with an GeForce GTS 450. Sorry, L. T.).

    However... a few years back, when I got into development on Alien Arena, the Linux release package had a Makefile, but also included a binary. Pretty much evolutionary from the Quake 2 and DOS roots. Worked ok, sort of, if installed in the user home directory. But, with Linux, of course, this is non-standard. Distro packagers, with good reason, installed the program and data in /usr. Being eager to learn more about packaging of Linux GPL'd programs, and ignorant of the dangers, I embarked on a GNU Autotools project. ... Months later, we had it sorted, leaving the building of binaries to the distros or the user. For a small, non-commercial, development group, this worked better -- fewer user problems, faster incorporation in distros.

    Not long ago, I tackled updating the Linux version on Desura. Damn ... back to building release binaries (32 and 64 bit), and installation in user's home directory. Have not had the time to master that, yet; have noted that it has some kind of system to install library dependencies. IMO, it is pretty clear that what is needed is a system that builds distro-specific packages. (My soapbox rant on this is: Debian is an OS, Fedora is an OS, Gentoo is an OS, ... Linux is not an OS. Ergo, TANSTAALB - There Ain't No Such Thing As Linux Binary.) Do not know much about it, but openSUSE Build Service seems like a better approach.

    We will try to get the Desura thing sorted. But, having gotten Linux support for Alien Arena to a point where it is manageable for a small, volunteer development group, it is a little annoying to have to deal with a new and different system.

    For those with some skills, doing your own build from the tarball works well. Our resources are limited, but our "regulars" update from our SVN repository between official releases, so our release package is tested and stable.

    At Alien Arena: AKA strat, stratocaster, stratokaztr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •