Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 77

Thread: openSUSE Has A Problem, Is Seeking New Direction

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default Tumbleweed

    Quote Originally Posted by alcalde View Post
    Going to a rolling release is not a realistic option; Tumbleweed is designed to be based off of something, not to roll forever. If the problem OpenSUSE has is integrating, a rolling release will just make things worse, not better. Disallowing certain repositories or creating parallel update paths also sounds like a recipe to make the distro more complicated to use.

    OpenSUSE is already running an 8 month release cycle and it has achieved great polish and stability from it... except for the last 12.1 release, which simply wasn't in a releasable state and needed at least 6 more weeks of bug-fixing. Now it sounds like 12.2 is in even worse shape, but at least the team is admitting it and looking for answers. The simplest answer may be switching to a yearly release cycle and then work on internal development and testing processes. Slamming code out as soon as its released (what Sabayon essentially does) destroys the ability to test or polish OpenSUSE and simply doesn't fit with the mission statement of OpenSUSE, which is to favor stability over features.
    I'm not sure what you mean by:
    "Tumbleweed is designed to be based off of something, not to roll forever".
    It's a rolling release of opensuse. It's been rolling for years now.

    I found opensuse updates the kernel almost as soon as new ones are released. KDE updates take longer to reach the repos. Sabayon was just the opposite and took much longer to update the kernel, but KDE was updated almost immediately. At least with mostly open source, I also have Flash, Tumbleweed has worked well for me. Sabayon not so much, though if you want the newest video driver blobs and kernel it's the only option.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LenS View Post
    ...though if you want the newest video driver blobs and kernel it's the only option.
    Because what's a "Gentoo", right? (Hint: Sabayon is pretty much Gentoo unstable with a few extra ebuilds. And no QA.)

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyatt View Post
    Because what's a "Gentoo", right? (Hint: Sabayon is pretty much Gentoo unstable with a few extra ebuilds. And no QA.)
    I always thought Gentoo was strictly open source, but I'm not that familiar with it, so I could be wrong.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LenS View Post
    I always thought Gentoo was strictly open source, but I'm not that familiar with it, so I could be wrong.
    Nope. Our ethos is of user choice; pragmatism is what we do. Even our more churlish developers aren't so spiteful as to attempt to dictate what choices you have. Skype 4 is already in the Portage tree as of yesterday (that's the earliest I noticed it). Heck, we even have people trying to get systemd working, despite having OpenRC already.

    Suffice to say, if they're looking to commit to rolling release, they could do far worse than looking to Gentoo for inspiration (or just rebase on us; we could absorb their patch flow easily).

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyatt View Post
    Nope. Our ethos is of user choice; pragmatism is what we do. Even our more churlish developers aren't so spiteful as to attempt to dictate what choices you have. Skype 4 is already in the Portage tree as of yesterday (that's the earliest I noticed it). Heck, we even have people trying to get systemd working, despite having OpenRC already.

    Suffice to say, if they're looking to commit to rolling release, they could do far worse than looking to Gentoo for inspiration (or just rebase on us; we could absorb their patch flow easily).
    Thanks, that's good to know. I'll try Gentoo again soon.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LenS View Post
    Thanks, that's good to know. I'll try Gentoo again soon.
    To clarify the above just a trifle, it's trivial to make it a "Free" distro by setting ACCEPT_LICENSE="-* @FSF-APPROVED" in make.conf (though most of us aren't really clear on why you'd want that). In a sense, it's BSD-ish: "here's a bag of tools, do what you want".

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    I hope they do not go the Rolling route. I have yet to see a rolling distro with good QA.
    However, if they pull off a well working rolling release distro, I'll end up being fine with it.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    809

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyatt View Post
    Nope. Our ethos is of user choice; pragmatism is what we do. Even our more churlish developers aren't so spiteful as to attempt to dictate what choices you have. Skype 4 is already in the Portage tree as of yesterday (that's the earliest I noticed it). Heck, we even have people trying to get systemd working, despite having OpenRC already.
    Archlinux had it in the official repos yesterday(fairly early in the day), as well.... There is definitely something to be said for distros that don't try to force software onto users. It was definitely something i enjoyed about Gentoo (when i was using it), and also something i enjoy about Archlinux. ~ give your user-base a basic core system, and let them decide what they will or will not use / adopt.

    Another reason distro's with build systems can be (more) pragmatic, is that we often can more easily get around license/legal issues (often) because we aren't actually shipping software with features enabled (that may not be redistributable, etc). And obviously ports/portage/ABS allow the user to modify things however they want to on their system.

    I think OpenSuse should try sticking with tumbleweed and shift development in that direction. If they are concerned about breakage, than don't 'roll' as quickly as Gentoo or Archlinux... instead keep behind by a month or something. Then by the time you are ready to roll out new software, chances are (at least) any big ugly / over-looked bug(s) have probably been addressed/fixed.

    Then OpenSuse users could kiss dist-upgrades and release-cycles goodbye ~ which is a good thing, IMO.... i wouldn't even consider using a distro that has 6month or even yearly releases. it's 2012 - we shouldn't have to re-install an OS every six months to a year, it's a bit of a joke, really.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default Dolphin Crashes

    I spoke too soon about Tumbleweed. I updated everything last night to linux 3.4.2 and KDE 4.8.4 and now right clicking any file in dolphin immediately crashes it. I filed a bug report and midnight commander works, but it's annoying. Hopefully it'll be fixed soon. I wouldn't mind waiting longer for updates if stability was better, but on the whole Tumbleweed has worked very well.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,904

    Default Just to clarify, OpenSUSE never had 6 month releases

    They were always set at a 9-month pace.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •