1. The commonly accepted definition of the word troll in this context, which I already gave to you.
2. The behavior you show in the posts I have read from you.
This is how people (should) build their opinions, based on facts.
Where is the objective criteria? Do you mean because you stated that in your opinion every one who claims that another person is a troll, regardless if this claim is based on facts every one can see, is a troll himself?the difference to my sentence to you is i proved for everyone with objective criteria that you ARE a Troll!
Since the only "fact" you are presenting is your opinion that I am a troll, besides the fact that i have not shown post in the kind of yours (insults and such) on this or any other forum, this claim is baseless.And after the Fact that you are the Troll its logic the Troll do what a Troll musst do because of this you call me a "Troll"
You are obviously "forgetting" that this thread only exists because you are annoying the people here and that you even claim that it is a success when you get away with it.In the Trolls logic its always the same he always call others Trolls to get away with his trolling.
Again, this thread exists only because you, with the type of posts you have already made, have shown to the people what kind of person you are. I don't have to provoke any reaction, you have already shown your face.and your behavior show that you only try to attack me with the primary intent of provoking me and force me into an emotional response
I have tried to discuss this definition with you. But you yourself delivered a definition that is exactly the definition of a troll. Oh, and again, remember that this topic only exists because of your way to deal with people.he is the only one who calls me a Troll only to insult me because of my definition of success in this "Ban-Qaridarium" Tropic.
1. I am not the OP of this thread. You have annoyed other people enough that they want you banned, and there are some people here that signed the petition.so he want me to make suicide and if not he try to force other people to ban me with the claim that i'm a troll.
2. The only one that can ban you is Micheal and I am in no position to force him to do that.
3. You yourself have shown with your behavior and with your own definition of success that you are a troll, not my fault.
Have you even considered for a moment to think about why people want you to be banned, and this not for the first time? Is it because you are so a nice person and all others are simply wrong with their opinion about you? Or is it because you permanently are annoying and insulting people and nobody wants to be annoyed and insulted? The highest success in this topic would neither be if you are banned nor if you are not banned. The highest success in this topic would be if you think about your posting style, stop behaving like an asshole and, maybe, apologize for your behavior. But since I can't see this happen I doubt that you can reach this goal.your definition is a suicide in this tropic because the tropic is: "ban-Qaridarium" the highest success in this tropic is not to be banned.
should i really be respectful for people who want me to be banned ?
A liar is someone who intentionally claims things that are not true. The keyword here is intentionally. Not everyone who posts untrue things is a liar, it may also be simple misinformation or misunderstanding. You should only call people liar if you have evidences that they are doing this with intention. If you can't do that you should point out what you think is wrong and why you think that it is wrong. Politely, this is how people behave in society.and if someone do lie then i should shut up my mouth and don't give the truth a voice by calling him a liar?
And was provoked by your behavior. Sometimes you can't be respectful, but not being respectful should be a last resort, not the rule. In your posts it seems to be the other way around.and what kind of discussion with respect is this tropic "ban-Qaridarium" ? this tropic do hurt your rules more than all my stuff together!