Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51

Thread: Netflix Open Connect Network: FreeBSD, Not Linux

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by M1kkko View Post
    Why is this news getting negative responses? What's wrong with using FreeBSD, why do so many seem to dislike it?

    Although I use neither Netflix nor FreeBSD myself, I think this is good news. It's always nice to see a company actually 'getting' the open source model and realising the importance of working as a community and contributing their changes upstream.
    It's not wrong, but it's a political decision in this case:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflix#Linux_support

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    55

    Cool Yay, FreeBSD...

    OK, I'm installing FreeBSD now so I can FINALLY enjoy mah Netflix!!!111elevenOne

    Oh, wait...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    55

    Default

    It's not like FreeBSD doesn't work, it probably does but let's be honest here. They didn't choose FreeBSD based on technical merit alone, they chose it because of the license which allows them to do whatever the heck they want. Linux is far more mature and I'm sure would have required less work but companies like Netflix like to keep their proprietary stuff safe which the BSD license guarantees.
    Anyway I'm still going to use Linux and that famous bay , I hear it has free, no DRM movies ...
    Competition in general though is not bad so bring it on FreeBSD ... so far compared to Linux I'm not impressed at all.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    449

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mcirsta View Post
    They didn't choose FreeBSD based on technical merit alone, they chose it because of the license which allows them to do whatever the heck they want. Linux is far more mature and I'm sure would have required less work but companies like Netflix like to keep their proprietary stuff safe which the BSD license guarantees.
    That seems like a reasonably fair assessment.


    Quote Originally Posted by mcirsta View Post
    Competition in general though is not bad so bring it on FreeBSD ... so far compared to Linux I'm not impressed at all.
    My only complaints with FreeBSD are that it doesn't have a driver for my sound card (CMI8788 chipset) and that the graphics drivers are very outdated (I can't use r600g). Skype and Steam would be nice, but I can't blame the lack of those on the FreeBSD devs :-) With respect to these complaints:

    • There is a work-in-progress driver for the CMI8788 chipset, so that will get fixed.
    • The KMS patches from Konstantin Belousov have been committed to the FreeBSD-HEAD.
    • There's still work to be done on Radeon KMS (Konstantin's updates were for Intel cards) and then there's TTM, but he said me may work on these after the Intel patches are stable.


    I'm waiting patiently until these are done - the sound card driver is the killer, but the r600c driver is good enough for me to cope with.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mcirsta View Post
    It's not like FreeBSD doesn't work, it probably does but let's be honest here. They didn't choose FreeBSD based on technical merit alone, they chose it because of the license which allows them to do whatever the heck they want. Linux is far more mature and I'm sure would have required less work but companies like Netflix like to keep their proprietary stuff safe which the BSD license guarantees.
    GPL covers distribution, not usage: Netflix could take the kernel, modify it at will and use it for its CDN without sharing a single line of code as long as they don't redistribute it. They could even contribute back improvements where appropriate while keeping the "secret" bits to themself.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    698

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tettamanti View Post
    GPL covers distribution, not usage: Netflix could take the kernel, modify it at will and use it for its CDN without sharing a single line of code as long as they don't redistribute it. They could even contribute back improvements where appropriate while keeping the "secret" bits to themself.
    Yes, but do they know that? It's not like there's a shortage of people with some misunderstandings of what the GPL actually does and doesn't do.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,989

    Default Great

    This is great!
    While I myself do not use FreeBSD, I am very happy for FreeBSD!

    It is great that such a large company decided to use them, and its great that Netflix is open sourcing their hardware and their software!
    Hats of to them!

    I wish Netflix and FreeBSD good luck!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archibald View Post
    crazycheese: How do the above fit with your description of them as "all-proprietary".
    Easy - ring a bell, when you actually can WATCH netflix on BSD.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delgarde View Post
    Yes, but do they know that? It's not like there's a shortage of people with some misunderstandings of what the GPL actually does and doesn't do.
    My Linux/GCC-powered Toshiba TV says they do.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    99

    Default Linux morons

    The same old Linux morons in this forum as usual.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •