Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Btrfs In Linux 3.5 Is Not Too Exciting

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Btrfs In Linux 3.5 Is Not Too Exciting

    Phoronix: Btrfs In Linux 3.5 Is Not Too Exciting

    The Btrfs pull request for the Linux 3.5 kernel went in on Friday, but it's not particularly exciting...

    Btrfs In Linux 3.5 Is Not Too Exciting - Phoronix
    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTExMjg
    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
    Tags: None
  • #2
    File system for SSD?

    I am currently using a SSD with ext4.
    Eventually, I guess I will switch to btrfs when its more mature.

    What is the best file system for a SSD?

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by uid313 View Post
      I am currently using a SSD with ext4.
      Eventually, I guess I will switch to btrfs when its more mature.

      What is the best file system for a SSD?
      Currently, I'm using ext4 with the discard mount option. I'm too nervous about btrfs data loss issues yet, and I'm going to wait on it for a bit longer.

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Veerappan View Post
        Currently, I'm using ext4 with the discard mount option. I'm too nervous about btrfs data loss issues yet, and I'm going to wait on it for a bit longer.
        Yeah, I am using the 'discard' mount option too. I think I also use noatime or relatime (to save writes on the SSD).
        But wonder what is the best file system for SSD?

        ext4, ZFS, btrfs, NILFS2, JFFS2, UBIFS, YAFFS, LogFS, etc?

        Comment

        Previous template Next
        Working...
        X