Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Intel Ivy Bridge: Unity/Compiz Continues To Impair The Linux Desktop

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,359

    Default Intel Ivy Bridge: Unity/Compiz Continues To Impair The Linux Desktop

    Phoronix: Intel Ivy Bridge: Unity/Compiz Continues To Impair The Linux Desktop

    As the latest Intel Ivy Bridge Linux graphics benchmarks to publish, here is a comparison of some of the different desktop environment options of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS when using the Intel Linux graphics driver on the Core i7 3770K with its HD 4000 graphics. The desktop environments being compared include Unity, Unity 2D, KDE, and Xfce. The default Ubuntu Unity desktop with Compiz continues to have problems for the open-source friendly company's drivers.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17386

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    555

    Default /save link for future reference.

    ... Of-course, the lousy performance exhibit by Unity, will not prevent it from being used in the next Linux vs. *BSD / Windows / OSX.
    I can only wonder why... *, **

    - Gilboa
    * And no, being number #1 in Google trends is enough to make Ubuntu the de-facto Linux standard.
    ** ... Cause Google trends is just as reliable / unreliable as Distrowatch (that lists Ubuntu as #2)
    DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX680, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711.
    SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F20/x86_64, Dell U2412..
    BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F20/x86-64.
    LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F20/x86_64.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael
    Compiz has turned out to be a shivery wreck that is unlikely to see dramatic improvements in the near future.
    Wrong. They found a major 3D performance regression within Unity affecting most applications/games. The first fix will be in "unity 5.12-0ubuntu1.1", currently in precise-proposed, but there are some more changes needed for the full fix.

    See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...ty/+bug/987304 & https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...y/+bug/1005074

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    206

    Default Title

    I wonder why the article is titled "Intel Ivy Bridge: ...." whereas it doesn't have to do anything with Ivy Bridge at all.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    65

    Default

    I know it isn't finalized yet, but could we see these benchmarks run against the Pantheon Desktop Environment from Elementary OS Luna? A little Googling reveals which PPAs contain it, or you could install a daily build of Luna.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Linuxhippy View Post
    I wonder why the article is titled "Intel Ivy Bridge: ...." whereas it doesn't have to do anything with Ivy Bridge at all.
    The entire thing is about these benchmarks which are running on an Ivy Bridge CPU and graphics.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    313

    Default Loosing credibility are we here?

    This article seemed intent on promoting KDE even though by my eyes XCFE has done a far better job than KDE overall. So has Phoronix fallen off the unbiased wagon to take a ride on the KDE buggy?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wizard69 View Post
    This article seemed intent on promoting KDE even though by my eyes XCFE has done a far better job than KDE overall. So has Phoronix fallen off the unbiased wagon to take a ride on the KDE buggy?
    1. It's "losing" and not "loosing"
    2. WTF?

    Please cite an example of what you're talking about, because I read the article again and didn't see anything like KDE promotion. Here are the mentions of xfce/KDE:

    The desktops leading to the fastest results were KDE with suspended effects and then Xfce 4.8 with its default window manager.... Xfce and KDE (with suspended effects) were 21% faster than Unity 5.10..... Xfce continued to run in line with the suspended KDE effects position.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,442

    Default

    Wasn't there another benchmark article that basically showed Ubuntu and Windows at comparable performance on the nvidia driver?

    Yet the conclusion of the article is that compiz is a turd.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Running only 120 instead of 140 fps in ioquake3 games is an "impairment to the linux desktop"?? *facepalm*

    This article sounds more like Michael had a bavaria-related impairment going on...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •