Have you clarified that benching for make -j128 means nothing?OK. Have you read my benchmark ?
That's fine, but drawing conclusions because a scheduler handles make jobs of 128 and higher better than another is wrong.Don't you understand what i am talking about? "RIFS can handle interactive well from low workload to high workload on desktop." I have mentioned about that and seems you haven't read my newest post. That means you don't have anything to debate with me, all right ?
There is no such claim. I'm simply pointing out that readers should ignore test results with absurd work loads. They server no comparative purpose.OK I mention one more things. U haven't try and you are just claiming that *RIFS* is really bad, so anyway you don't have anything to debate with me