Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Qualcomm Calls To "Kill All Proprietary Drivers For Good"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,816

    Default Qualcomm Calls To "Kill All Proprietary Drivers For Good"

    Phoronix: Qualcomm Calls To "Kill All Proprietary Drivers For Good"

    Next week at the 6th annual Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit in San Francisco, two Qualcomm Atheros engineers will be speaking about their Linux device driver development experiences and will go as far as calling for all proprietary drivers to be killed for good. They talk not just about killing proprietary drivers for Linux, but for all operating systems. Can the plans they lay out to kill all proprietary drivers work or is this just a big pipe-dream?

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17208

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,501

    Default

    Quite a bit of irony as I'm currently banging my head trying to do something extraordinarily ordinary with a Qualcomm ARM chip, only to find that the data it returns is proprietary and you need a magic decoder ring to convert it to something usable.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    That's because they haven't build something that may see the light of day, because, from the ground up, they haven't taken any measures to avoid into account.

    It's not a call to open source; it's a call to make something that you CAN open source.

    Duh. RTFA.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Many hardware vendors remain too tight over IP concerns. Even the open-source friendly AMD with their Radeon graphics driver this week found out after months of technical/legal review that they couldn't even open up some of their HDMI/DisplayPort audio code, etc. Not to mention, open-source video decoding looks like an impossible feat at this point.
    Auggh !!

    As I said a few times already, it wasn't *our* IP that affected the audio code, it was someone *else's* IP. I don't see how you think we can "be loose with someone else's IP".

    re: open source video decode, the only one saying it's impossible is Q. We're saying it's really difficult and *might* not be possible.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    208

    Default

    Software patents begone! Everyone is afraid that patent trolls will mine any company provided released drivers for potential profit generating activities through the legal system.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    467

    Default

    Drivers on themselves have no value. The value is in being able to control hardware.
    I really like the idea of open sourcing drivers because many companies just abandon old things without support or anything. Sometimes not even stable, usable drivers!!! With Open Source drivers the community could adapt things to new platforms very easily.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    While everyone loves killer performance, the FLOSS AMD driver users are not realy into that and so I'd like to see work going into a good video hwAccel state tracker instead of a non-abstracted UVD that's only tied to Radeon anyway.

    And I'm AMD all the way in terms of GPU's and prefer AMD x86 over Intel x86, while I prefer ARM over x86, because it's fucking rediculous that anything digital still needs moving parts (fans) and draws so much power, while an iPad 3 can deliver gorgious graphics and top notch UI responsiveness with 10hours of batterylife on a damn high res display>.<
    Last edited by V!NCENT; 03-29-2012 at 12:07 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    And I'm AMD all the way in terms of GPU's and prefer AMD x86 over Intel x86, while I prefer ARM over x86, because it's fucking rediculous that anything digital still needs moving parts (fans) and draws so much power, while an iPad 3 can deliver gorgious graphics and top notch UI responsiveness with 10hours of batterylife on a damn high res display>.<
    This. 10chars.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Michael: "looks like an impossible feat at this point."

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Auggh !!

    As I said a few times already, it wasn't *our* IP that affected the audio code, it was someone *else's* IP. I don't see how you think we can "be loose with someone else's IP".

    re: open source video decode, the only one saying it's impossible is Q. We're saying it's really difficult and *might* not be possible.
    LOL I'm not the only Pessimist out there now i have a big buddy "Michael" LOL

    no I'm not the only one... Michael is also on my side

    if a Optimist say: "t's really difficult and *might* not be possible."

    then its a impossible suicide mission !

    like the Japanese fighters in world war 2... "*Might* not be possible"

    really I laugh at you when you fail with the UVD unit!

    then the Pessimistic realists won the "Future" predict war.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    somewhere at the edge of the Milky Way
    Posts
    98

    Exclamation Awesome, but there's a catch…

    Quote Originally Posted by plonoma View Post
    I really like the idea of open sourcing drivers because many companies just abandon old things without support or anything.
    I absolutely love the idea of anyone being able to debug and improve the way my hardware works, but it's most likely never gonna happen, because the ability to force us into constantly purchasing new hardware by simply discontinuing it's proprietary drivers bears far too much commercial value.
    Last edited by »John«; 03-29-2012 at 01:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •