Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Fedora 18 Will Go For Tmpfs

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    thats weird, i've never had that issue. however, if there was ever the occasion where something from yaourt failed, i never assumed it was because of the tmpfs.

    what i don't get is why don't distros use ramfs? that dynamically expands, so you pretty much only use up what you need.
    Try building kernels with packer. tmpfs will run out of space.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unix_epoch View Post
    Have they mentioned what video editing and CD/DVD/BD burning programs are supposed to do with their multi-GB temporary files after the switch? Where are we supposed to render our movies and build our ISOs?
    If you read the article, the answer is in it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs is the specification and such programs should be fixed to use /var/tmp instead of /tmp. A direct quote

    "My CD burning application writes huge .iso files to /tmp, and this breaks on tmpfs!

    The application should be fixed to use /var/tmp. "

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Have the Nvidia binary drivers been fixed? They used to break when /tmp was tmpfs.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyser View Post
    I have been using tmpfs for /tmp and /var/tmp for years and years on my gentoo system. Why is this such a big deal?
    Mine are also tmpfs and I also picked up the habit when a Gentoo user (long since switched to Ubuntu). I have 24 GB for each so I don't have issues with ISOs being created there. On server systems I have 64GB allocated.

    I've yet to see a file in /var/tmp - does any software actually use it?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shiftyphil View Post
    Have the Nvidia binary drivers been fixed? They used to break when /tmp was tmpfs.
    Binary blob has had no problems with this for a while now. I ran my ThinkPad T410 containing an nVidia 3100M in such a configuration ever since I got it back in January 2011. (Don't have that laptop anymore now, though.)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,053

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    what i don't get is why don't distros use ramfs? that dynamically expands, so you pretty much only use up what you need.
    It doesn't swap, and an ordinary user can fill the ram with ramfs (=local DOS).

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,023

    Default Already

    I already use tmpfs for /tmp today, and have been doing so for a while to save disk writes on my solid-state disk (SSD).

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shiftyphil View Post
    Have the Nvidia binary drivers been fixed? They used to break when /tmp was tmpfs.
    I have been using Nvidia binary drivers and /tmp on a tmpfs for a long time, and it works perfectly; problem is probably on the mount parameters (avoid "nodev", "noexec", "nosuid", ... in /etc/fstab). Hope this helps.

  9. #19

    Default

    We've been doing this since the beginning at Fuduntu, and recommended it for Eee PCs for years before that. It's about time others got on board.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grotgrot View Post
    I've yet to see a file in /var/tmp - does any software actually use it?
    KDE 4.x does.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •