Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: First Release Of The New Mode-Setting Driver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,098

    Default First Release Of The New Mode-Setting Driver

    Phoronix: First Release Of The New Mode-Setting Driver

    David Airlie officially released the first version of the xf86-video-modesetting DDX driver this week. The xf86-video-modesetting driver is a generic KMS X.Org driver that will work with any kernel mode-setting DRM driver in Linux, but only provides shadow frame-buffer support...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA1ODc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,182

    Default

    I'm curious, is there an advantage to running this over KMS FB compared to fbdev on KMS FB?

    Sure it's one layer less, but still sw accel.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    589

    Default

    I'm not 100% sure but I think this new DDX driver allows you to change the resolution using XRandr which I don't think you can do using fbdev

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,182

    Default

    That's a good point. Even though KMS FB can change the res, I don't think anyone's written a tool to do that, the console is always at max res (barring the bootcode, IIRC).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    That's a good point. Even though KMS FB can change the res, I don't think anyone's written a tool to do that, the console is always at max res (barring the bootcode, IIRC).
    Setting the res other than the native one could and should be done with a kernel boot option, eg. screen=1280x1024. No boot option will just simply set the max res allowed by the monitor

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,182

    Default

    Yes, and there's a clear lack of a tool, command-line xrandr so to say.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    964

    Default

    This driver should also be useful as a framework for developing drivers for new graphics chips that may come out in the future

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,102

    Default Acceleration

    I am curious to know if this driver could be improved and how.

    Is it possible to add any type of acceleration to it?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,102

    Default Difference?

    How is this any different from softpipe / llvmpipe?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    I am curious to know if this driver could be improved and how.

    Is it possible to add any type of acceleration to it?
    I'm sure it is possible to add some degree of acceleration to it, depending on the hardware its driving. Perhaps older cards can be used with it
    Last edited by DeepDayze; 02-18-2012 at 09:51 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •