Benchmarks are benchmarks, should there be any improvment in real usage? I've had the driver installed since it was released, but I dont think I've honestly noticed any diffrence...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA XRender Performance Improved
Collapse
X
-
I've done a bunch of benchmarks on the new beta driver and xrender, and render_bench is the only benchmark that shows these great results without any tweaking. Specifically, setting InitialPixmapPlacement to 2, at least on my 8800 gts.
A better benchmark of xrender, that shows results closer to what you would get from real applications, is expedite. And yes, evas software rendering is still almost twice as fast as xrender in the overall expedite results.
expedite
InitialPixmapPlacement=2
-----------------------------------
nvidia-169.04 xrender - http://pastebin.ca/790277
nvidia-100.14 xrender - http://pastebin.ca/790281
nvidia-169.04 X11 - http://pastebin.ca/790279
xrenderbenchmark
-------------------------------------------
100.14 - http://pastebin.ca/784454
169.04 - http://pastebin.ca/784457
xrenderbenchmark
InitialPixmapPlacement=2
-----------------------------------
100.14 - http://pastebin.ca/790287
169.04 - http://pastebin.ca/790286
Comment
-
Originally posted by platform View PostSoooo... if Qt is compiled with XRender support then KDE should be more responsive in 2D, right? What about Gtk and Gnome?
Comment
Comment