Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: GNOME Shell Works Without GPU Driver Support

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,315

    Default GNOME Shell Works Without GPU Driver Support

    Phoronix: GNOME Shell Works Without GPU Driver Support

    As reported on Thursday, GNOME Shell / Mutter no longer requirements OpenGL-accelerated hardware drivers. It's possible to run this GNOME3 desktop with a software back-end via Gallium3D's LLVMpipe...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTAxMjI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Maybe they can get around to reducing the CPU consumption of gnome-shell. On my machine it uses an inordinate amount of CPU even though I don't really use it (I have windows maximized on my two monitors and spend most time typing into them).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Israel, Tel-Avil
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Isn't that surprising? g-shell doesn't have a single feature that needs 3d acceleration.
    It just a poisonous mixture of ideology of keeping up with what others do (aka we have to use composing) and with Gnome decease of feature removal, according to which best computer is that one that has just one button, to turn it off.

    So using LLVMpipe to workaround that stupidity, is just stupid as well.
    Ether g-shell should use at least xrender, or it should actually utilize 3d features.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxim Levitsky View Post
    Isn't that surprising? g-shell doesn't have a single feature that needs 3d acceleration.
    It just a poisonous mixture of ideology of keeping up with what others do (aka we have to use composing) and with Gnome decease of feature removal, according to which best computer is that one that has just one button, to turn it off.

    So using LLVMpipe to workaround that stupidity, is just stupid as well.
    Ether g-shell should use at least xrender, or it should actually utilize 3d features.
    Calling other people stupid while obviously not understanding anything is generally known as "trolling". First compositing has nothing to do with 3D rendering. Secondly XRender is not a replacement for OpenGL and last it does use quite a lot of "3D features" (note "3D features" does not mean "rotating cube").

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    58

    Default

    fallback mode isn't meant to be a GNOME 2-by-stealth for Shell refuseniks, it's purely an attempt to accommodate hardware which doesn't support Shell.
    -.-

    why not? it would make so many people happy :P Are they afraid nobody will use their great and awesome and user-friendly shell anymore once they make the 'fallback mode' a usable alternative?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    240

    Default

    As reported on Thursday, GNOME Shell / Mutter no longer requirements OpenGL-accelerated hardware drivers.
    Hit me if Im wrong, but isnt it "requires"?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default Long live the fallback mode

    As long as there are people who love the fallback mode there will be packages for it. Fallback mode will prevail. Take a look at mint, they are doing it right.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Israel, Tel-Avil
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drago01 View Post
    Calling other people stupid while obviously not understanding anything is generally known as "trolling". First compositing has nothing to do with 3D rendering. Secondly XRender is not a replacement for OpenGL and last it does use quite a lot of "3D features" (note "3D features" does not mean "rotating cube").
    Nope. it just so happens that when person runs out of arguments (or has none to begin with) it accuses the other person of trolling.
    Note that unlike you I have never accused anybody here or elsewhere of trolling. I even say once on a while that I 'troll' because I know I will be labeled as such because of my opinions that I somewhat don't hide.
    Last edited by Maxim Levitsky; 11-06-2011 at 07:39 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxim Levitsky View Post
    Nope. it just so happens that when person runs out of arguments (or has none to begin with) it accuses the other person of trolling.
    So your are accusing other people (me included) as being stupid because of technical decision that you apparently (judging by your comment) do not understand? And then wonder why you are being named a troll?

    As for arguments you ignored everything and focused on the troll one but anyway I am done here.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Just stop. It's very obvious to everybody with half a clue who is the one being blatantly ignorant here.

    Being a idiot on the internet on purpose is being a troll.
    Being a idiot because you have no clue what is going on or what you are talking about is just being a idiot.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •