Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52

Thread: AMD Catalyst 11.10 Linux Driver Released

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I've tested the 11.10 with my radeon hd 3450 / p8400 under Archlinux.
    It seems smoother, really. I can read a HD movie and use the kwin cube effect without noticing a frame rate slow down, there's no tearing, and it seems reliable.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    88

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    dammit my arch setup isn't updating all the way because of this xserver 1.11 issue. good to know about the kwin stuff though.
    Why not ignore updating the xorg packages?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Sometime ago I had troubles installing 11.9 manually(it build installed but black screen happened, back to opencource), so i went to Synaptic to see if 11.10 is there yet. I guess its not, there is nothing new in changelog. But what caught my attention was fglrx-updates package. Does anyone know the difference between fglrx-updates vs fglrx in Ubuntu ?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    170

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaemonFC View Post
    It doesn't.

    Also, it works now with kwin direct GL if you override the default through an environment variable, but it's only usable without vsync or tear free desktop on, else it is really slow.

    Thanks but whats the magic "environment variable"?

    Thanks

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pseus View Post
    Argh, I hoped xorg 1.11 support would be included in this release. I just hope 11.11 gets released sooner next month.
    Their Linux release date is basically decided by Microsoft since they won't release a Linux build until Microsoft decides to "WHQL" certify this month's buid. (Basically a meaningless sign off that the DRM still works and a chance to make it unaffordable for smaller organizations to make Windows drivers.)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rallos Zek View Post
    Thanks but whats the magic "environment variable"?

    Thanks
    export KWIN_DIRECT_GL=1

    in .bashrc

    But I'll warn you that Catalyst is pretty misbehaved in this mode. Performance is better using the legacy OpenGL 1 backend with indirect rendering.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Hannover (Germany)
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Can somebody help me to install this driver on Fedora 16?

    I'm not a Linux newbie, but I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora and have some trouble to install the driver. I always get a black screen or my screen goes to standby at GDM.

    I allready tried the "nomodeset" kernel argument with no success. I installed the driver via the ati installer. Anything else you need to know to help me?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dopehouse View Post
    Can somebody help me to install this driver on Fedora 16?

    I'm not a Linux newbie, but I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora and have some trouble to install the driver. I always get a black screen or my screen goes to standby at GDM.

    I allready tried the "nomodeset" kernel argument with no success. I installed the driver via the ati installer. Anything else you need to know to help me?
    Fedora 16 uses X.org Server 1.11, which Catalyst doesn't support.

    You can use Fedora 15, a distribution that still ships an old version of the X server like *buntu, or you can (*_BAD IDEA!!!!!_*) attempt to replace the X.org Server in Fedora 16 with one from Fedora 15. (I haven't done this, but there are a few reports that it "works", whatever that means.)

    Fedora users are often stuck on old releases because Ubuntu and OpenSuse tend to use obsolete components to make it less work for proprietary driver vendors to support them. AMD Catalyst supported distributions tend to be a release or two behind on the X server or the kernel on launch.

    Nvidia is better about making sure their drivers work, even if it's labeled "beta" you almost always have same day Fedora support.

    As for "nomodeset", you have to use that one on Fedora 15 (the RPM Fusion packages add it for you) because the open source radeon module loads too and also attempts to control the hardware. So you get radeon in the kernel trying to set the video mode at the same time Catalyst/FGLRX is trying to set the video mode from user space through the X server, and so the entire system just locks up.

    In Ubuntu, the packages add a blacklist entry for the radeon driver, so nomodeset or radeon.modeset=0 is not necessary because radeon isn't ever loaded. In Fedora it's stitting there doing nothing, and I think the reason you can't change it is because Ubuntu compiles it as a module while Fedora compiles it into the kernel image so the user can't blacklist it.
    Last edited by DaemonFC; 11-01-2011 at 10:35 AM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Hannover (Germany)
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Thanks for the fast reply. I'll try the driver on my Notebook with F15 and GNOME-Shell.

    Regards
    Dopehouse

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    75

    Default

    For some reason I haven't had any problems thus far with Linux 3.1 + this new driver. (Just renamed the 11.9 ebuild.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •