Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: WattOS: Is It Faster & Can Save Power Over Ubuntu?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,816

    Default WattOS: Is It Faster & Can Save Power Over Ubuntu?

    Phoronix: WattOS: Is It Faster & Can Save Power Over Ubuntu?

    For some months I've been meaning to try out WattOS, an Ubuntu derivative that claims to do more than providing simple desktop theme changes and other high-level customizations. It seeks to provide a simple and fast desktop that's also said to conserve more power and run better on older hardware, but is this actually the case? Here are benchmarks of WattOS R4 compared to the upstream Ubuntu 11.04 release from which it's derived, and the numbers are quite revealing.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16471

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Is it just me or lately the table with the system specs always shows up like this?



    Same thing with firefox/chromium/konqueror.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Utriusque Siciliae Regnum
    Posts
    48

    Thumbs down This test sounds a little bit ridiculous

    WattOS should be aimed to productivity workstation under normal usage.
    How can OpenArena, H.264 video encoding, gfx rendering, OpenSSL, Apache and password cracking fit this profile?
    Your ideas about productivity are at least questionable.
    Instead, boot the system, make some word processing, datasheet stuff, a little bit of browsing and leave the machine idle 10 to 15 minutes every 1 or two house.
    This sounds more likely to be a "productivity workstation usage".
    It's really hard to save power and compete for computing intensive tasks!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Utriusque Siciliae Regnum
    Posts
    48

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by [Knuckles] View Post
    Is it just me or lately the table with the system specs always shows up like this?



    Same thing with firefox/chromium/konqueror.
    No, it's just you and another half billion users.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,791

    Default

    Yeah, the width of the articles is so ridiculously narrow, nothing fits. Font size is also hilariously small. Please, please make the damn thing have a dynamic width and larger fonts. This is 2011, we don't run 640x480 with 75dpi displays anymore.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    221

    Default

    Shorter lines are actually easier to read, and there's also a new trend of mobile devices about with small screens in case you hadn't noticed. So only the chart that's a problem in my opinion...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,791

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyborg16 View Post
    Shorter lines are actually easier to read, and there's also a new trend of mobile devices about with small screens in case you hadn't noticed. So only the chart that's a problem in my opinion...
    The width of the article has nothing to do with the text lines. You can make text wrap at smaller values than the article width.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    376

    Default

    I get the table-that's-too-large problem too, when I'm lucky. Usually it looks like this:



    I _am_ running RequestPolicy and NoScript but I tried enabling stuff and nothing makes sense. Sometimes the tables are ok, sometimes not, with the same settings (firefox 3.6).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    232

    Default

    I'm planning on getting a new AMD E-450 netbook soon. I'd love to run linux on it, but I'd hate to lose 20-30% of my battery life just by installing Linux.

    What distro is the best for battery life? Or should I just stick with Windows 7?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    I'm planning on getting a new AMD E-450 netbook soon. I'd love to run linux on it, but I'd hate to lose 20-30% of my battery life just by installing Linux.

    What distro is the best for battery life? Or should I just stick with Windows 7?
    They're going to shoot me for saying this, but I'll say it... Debian Stable beats the snot out of Ubuntu in battery life, it's noticeably better..
    Though of course you can also tweak your Ubuntu install to get battery life, as discussed in previous articles.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •