i'm wondering this simple question since i've seen a lot of users using that distro and having themselves go mad with the ati-drivers.
wouldn't it be wiser for them to use an official ati packaged distro as opensuse (this is an example since i've seen it in the supported distro and i've tried it)?
going with 8.37 when there is the 8.42, that is not so bad, when 8.37 won't work with xorg7.3 and server 1.4 and with the 2.6.23 kernel for me is nonsense.
and if the ubuntu devs really support oss do they include the last ati-drivers? i don't know this thing, since i'm not an ubuntu/kubuntu user but would be insterting to know at least this thing about a distro that claims to be a good one and user oriented.
wouldn't it be wiser for them to use an official ati packaged distro as opensuse (this is an example since i've seen it in the supported distro and i've tried it)?
going with 8.37 when there is the 8.42, that is not so bad, when 8.37 won't work with xorg7.3 and server 1.4 and with the 2.6.23 kernel for me is nonsense.
and if the ubuntu devs really support oss do they include the last ati-drivers? i don't know this thing, since i'm not an ubuntu/kubuntu user but would be insterting to know at least this thing about a distro that claims to be a good one and user oriented.
Comment