Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 127

Thread: The KDE vs. GNOME Schism In Free Software

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,649

    Default The KDE vs. GNOME Schism In Free Software

    Phoronix: The KDE vs. GNOME Schism In Free Software

    For those looking for an interesting read today, Martin GršŖlin, the maintainer of KDE's KWin and known for his insightful blog posts, has written about fighting the schism in free software; in particular, the KDE vs. GNOME battle...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTk0Nw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default

    I like the fact that there is a schism between Desktop Environments. Sure there should be some cooperation, but I would hate to see real competition diminish. Get too close and smarmy, and you end up with only one desktop environment, and IMHO that would be a very bad thing. I despise the direction of the Gnome project. I don't want to see KDE cozying up too close to them, but I won't get into a firey debate on why. I just like a nice distance between the two, with some healthy respect, but also a firm dislike.
    Last edited by FreeBooteR69; 09-27-2011 at 01:20 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,086

    Default

    I used to think that gnome was good and kde sucked.




    Now they both suck.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    Now they both suck.
    Yeah, the real battle will be between XFCE and LXDE after everyone dumps Gnome.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    Yeah, the real battle will be between XFCE and LXDE after everyone dumps Gnome.
    The real winner here (and overall in Linux) may be Unity in Ubuntu. It really looks like a product with vision and users in mind. About Grasslin, I think the guy sometimes doesn't know what he's talking about:

    http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blo...r-interaction/

    Itís the argument I hate most when it comes to adding new features or removing existing ones when needed. Nobody is going down the GNOME road and itís a very insulting statement towards the awesome GNOME developers for whom I have great respect.
    Why it's insulting? I don't want KDE to go the same way as Gnome, something wrong with that? Reading some of his responses makes me wonder in what world is he living?

    You are not a Developer

    Remember that you are not a developer. You should not try to discuss about technical details with developers: you cannot win. No matter how good your opinion is, no matter how smart you are, the developer is most likely an expert in his area and has a better view on issues. If he tells you something is not possible, it most likely is. If he tells you he cannot fix a bug, thatís the case. If he has to remove a feature, he has to. Please accept it, donít argue, you will make a fool out of yourself.
    That's a total bullshit.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FreeBooteR69 View Post
    I like the fact that there is a schism between Desktop Environments. Sure there should be some cooperation, but I would hate to see real competition diminish. Get too close and smarmy, and you end up with only one desktop environment, and IMHO that would be a very bad thing. I despise the direction of the Gnome project. I don't want to see KDE cozying up too close to them, but I won't get into a firey debate on why. I just like a nice distance between the two, with some healthy respect, but also a firm dislike.
    That schism should be relegated to Mad OS and Windows 7/8.

    Pray, let the KDE/Gnome/xfce/LXDE debacles die.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,656

    Default

    I don't care about desktop schism and it doesn't matter much i think. What i find somehow annoying is the toolkit schism -or at least lack of the seamless cooperation between gtk,qt,enlightenment etc. Consistency is important and the lack of it hurts the experience.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    I don't care about desktop schism and it doesn't matter much i think. What i find somehow annoying is the toolkit schism -or at least lack of the seamless cooperation between gtk,qt,enlightenment etc. Consistency is important and the lack of it hurts the experience.
    What you think *does* matter, since the desktop is supposed to cater your needs.

    I agree that inconsistency and using different standards makes my soul bleed.

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    The real winner here (and overall in Linux) may be Unity in Ubuntu.
    I agree with most of your post, but unity?!?? I tried gnome 3, KDE 4.6 and I liked them both way more than unity. I almost prefer Windows over unity. And I've been a ubuntu-kiddie for over 5 years.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Without trolling, seriously, the only reason that people want to support old crap form a publicity standpoint is that Gnome is way more popular than KDE, whilst no one being realy serious can say that Gnome is better than KDE.

    KDE looks better, does things more efficiently, has more features, has technological superiority.

    Gnome just is a piece of usability that has gone one bridge too far. If you cut features out of the users control then fine, but automate them in the background. But no... None of this happens. And it's not as if it can keep up with Mac OS X advancements, or even Windows advancements for crying out loud.

    It's just a piece of crap. Period. I like XFCE, Enlightenment, KDE, Fluxbox, WindowMaker... but there is this one garbage GUI that is called Gnome. And if the rest of the OS spectrum could fill in the gaps, but then they even made Gnome 3 the way it is today. An absolutely horrible implementation of a semantic desktop, aka WinFS, that just shot down literaly all hope of progres to somewhat removing all the issues that Gnome 2 had from a missing feature standpoint.

    Realy, just realy horrible. I have a touchbased GUI in mind that can do the commandline without the typing, which can save Gnome and could even make its way into the poweruser club, while being so simple that John Average could understand it and shoot the tablet potential from utter crap into the sky. But the hell that I'm even going to document the idea and send it to them because I know that no-one is going to care for constructive critisism with potential solutions, because they see the DE not from the user demands but from the insights and aspects of their own organisation.

    It's just a horribly bad scenario and it's good that Canonical & Co(mmunity) stood up to make a replacement for it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    The real winner here (and overall in Linux) may be Unity in Ubuntu.
    Say what? Unity to me is the worst UI ever...to be relegated to netbooks or smartphones. While we need healthy competition between desktops, there should at least be some common ground

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •