Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 74

Thread: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,389

    Default NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

    Phoronix: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

    Up for review today is a low-end NVIDIA Fermi graphics card, the GeForce GT 520. The low-end graphics processor it uses, the GF119, was released back in April. The graphics card only has 48 Stream processors and uses DDR3 memory with a 64-bit bus, except the cost on this creation is just around $60 USD.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16212

  2. #2

    Default

    Seems as if AMD graphic cards are more efficient per Watt then their nVidia counterparts. I guess people considering low power usage should use ati cards?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    75

    Default

    This GPU is a joke.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    848

    Default

    Thanks for the review. As some people in this forum are pondering whether to pair their SandyBridge setup with such a low-end graphics card, could you include in future tests a comparison against SandyBridge?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,731

    Default

    7/10?

    why not 3/10? It is a low performance card, actively cooled and bested by cards for half the price. 7 - I could understand if it would be passively cooled and very low power - but if you want low power - the 5450 is the way to go.

    Looks like another card that has no place to go. Too powerhungry, not enough performance and a way to high price tag. If your card is beatend by two year old offerings for half the price you seriously have a problem.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    46

    Default

    This card has a passively cooled variant from Asus (see Asus ENGT520 SILENT). I have it in my HTPC with the cheapest dual-core Celeron I could find in my area, and using VDPAU the combination can play anything I throw at it, including 1080p with various encodings or HD flash content. The nice thing is that the VGA is passively cooled, the CPU is passively cooled, the HDDs and the PSU are low-noise so the computer is virtually silent. And the whole thing was way cheaper than any Sandy Bridge configuration would have been.

    My point is that this card might be slow in benchmaks and in games, but the same graphics chip still has its uses.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    880

    Default

    The 520 might be a bit (lot ) slow but I bet it runs with less tearing than this 5870 I'm using.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,731

    Default

    turn on tearfree, problem solved.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    880

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    turn on tearfree, problem solved.
    Tearfree has its own issues.

    I just live with the tearing at the moment.

    It's not like I can go with an nVidia solution for triple monitor so with Linux I have the best solution even though it's not perfect.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,269

    Default

    It uses more power than than the 6570 while delivering 1/2-1/3 the performance and being hot. Mmhm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •