Because I just made the mistake of updating the kernel to 2.6.23 but the 8.40. driver doesn't work.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will 8.42 support kernel 2.6.23?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by stealth View Postand how about xorg 1.4.0? will 8.42 support this version of xorg?Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
well, "very very soon" sounds really cool ;-)
right now i am forced to use the vesa-driver, and that's kind of ugly. on the other hand i could downgrade to an older xorg, but i prefer to wait for the new driver to be released ("very very soon")
Comment
-
Because I just made the mistake of updating the kernel to 2.6.23 but the 8.40. driver doesn't work
Code:diff -Naur common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c --- common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c 2007-07-29 13:36:37.000000000 +0200 +++ common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c 2007-07-29 14:24:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -2409,7 +2409,11 @@ #ifdef pte_offset_map pte_p = pte_offset_map(pmd_p, virtual_addr); if (pte_present(*pte_p)) +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) ret = (ptep_clear_flush_dirty(vma, virtual_addr, pte_p) ? 1 : 0); +#else + return 0; +#endif else __KE_DEBUG("page not exists!\n"); pte_unmap(pte_p); @@ -3399,9 +3403,11 @@ sprintf(buf, "0x%Lx %c%c%c%c%c%c\n", *phys_address, pte_present (pte) ? 'p' : '-', +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,23) pte_read (pte) ? 'r' : '-', - pte_write (pte) ? 'w' : '-', pte_exec (pte) ? 'x' : '-', +#endif + pte_write (pte) ? 'w' : '-', pte_dirty (pte) ? 'd' : '-', pte_young (pte) ? 'a' : '-'); } @@ -5348,7 +5354,11 @@ DBG_TRACE("creating slab object '%s'", slabcache_obj->name); if ((slabcache_obj->cache = +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,23) kmem_cache_create(slabcache_obj->name, iEntrySize, 0, 0, NULL, NULL))) +#else + kmem_cache_create(slabcache_obj->name, iEntrySize, 0, 0, NULL))) +#endif { ret = 1; }
Last edited by yoshi314; 10 October 2007, 01:17 PM.
Comment
-
Actually I just found out that they may be rethinking their decision to support 2.6.23 with 8.43 due to 64-bit issues...Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
Comment