Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 91

Thread: Burning Through Power: Linux Regressions Found

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Great job Michael. Your work is really appreciated.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6

    Default

    At the moment there are just big words. Nothing shown for real. That is not serious.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6

    Default

    xine-lib VAAPI support.

    http://crystalhd.svn.sourceforge.net...lib-1.2-vaapi/

    Phoronix doesn't tell you that there is also VAAPI support for xine-lib. Thx to this censored board where to information depends on phoronix, they wanna let you know or not.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ebsi View Post
    At the moment there are just big words. Nothing shown for real. That is not serious.
    http://phoronix.com/forums/search.php?searchid=136891

    Boring troll is boring

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1

    Default

    From the Twitter feed:
    The 2.6.38 reg workaround just saved 13% power on a ThinkPad, but looks like there's another ~23% can be worked out by PTS on other regs
    54 minutes ago

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,681

    Default

    i was expecting a huge article over the power regression


    probably its coming in the following days

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,795

    Default

    Michael has no clue that a site should place its readers before their adds sponsors?

    If you treat your readers like this, what the hell do you expect from them in return? You want add revenue? Be a good website then that people visit often and want to read. If you suck, you don't deserve revenue.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Is it the start of a flame?

    --
    A user who's going to click the ads

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Michael has no clue that a site should place its readers before their adds sponsors?

    If you treat your readers like this, what the hell do you expect from them in return? You want add revenue? Be a good website then that people visit often and want to read. If you suck, you don't deserve revenue.
    I don't like it either, but I can see his position on this.

    With that said, after all is said and done, I would love to see some reporting on precisely why he was the only person working on this. I heard nothing about other people doing anything at all. I tried looking for it on the mailing list once, but I did not find anything whatsoever. Something is seriously wrong if a media reporter is the only person available to work on an issue affecting so many people.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shining Arcanine View Post
    I don't like it either, but I can see his position on this.

    With that said, after all is said and done, I would love to see some reporting on precisely why he was the only person working on this. I heard nothing about other people doing anything at all. I tried looking for it on the mailing list once, but I did not find anything whatsoever. Something is seriously wrong if a media reporter is the only person available to work on an issue affecting so many people.
    No, Michael is definitely not the only person to work on an issue that affects lots of people. But he behaves like he is. He also forgets that his whole "enterprise" is based on free software and he didn't pay them anything back, he only tries to make money out of it.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •