Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Mozilla Puts Out Firefox 5.0 Web Browser

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Actually the effect is already weaning off, all the Chrome and FF dick-waving is causing everyone to start ignoring major version announcements, even for software that does not follow that model.
    When exactly has FF done this? I hardly heard anything about FF5, and the previous major version changes really have been pretty major.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    When exactly has FF done this? I hardly heard anything about FF5, and the previous major version changes really have been pretty major.
    Now? And FF6 in the next 3 months, FF7 in half a year...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Now? And FF6 in the next 3 months, FF7 in half a year...
    As I said, I hardly heard anything about FF5, so I don't think you can call that dick-waving. And it couldn't be the reason everyone is already "starting to ignore major version announcements" like you said, seeing as how it only happened for the first time this week.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,102

    Default

    Maybe you misunderstood me. I meant the major-version-every-n-weeks-without-reason behavior, not PR flaunting.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    There WILL be a LOT of people who will take this update and be really disappointed that nothing has really changed.
    I don't know a lot of people that run Firefox and care about the version number. You care if you have the newest features.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferdinand View Post
    I don't know a lot of people that run Firefox and care about the version number. You care if you have the newest features.
    They care when their addons break and they're forced to upgrade to a new version because Mozilla no longer releases security updates for the one they released three months ago. That's likely to be a significant hit for corporate use where they only want to use software they've tested... guess they'll be sticking to Firefox 3.6 or finding an alternative.

    As far as I can see this is a seriously braindead move on Mozilla's part, merely to keep up with Chrome's version numbers.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    They care when their addons break and they're forced to upgrade to a new version because Mozilla no longer releases security updates for the one they released three months ago. That's likely to be a significant hit for corporate use where they only want to use software they've tested... guess they'll be sticking to Firefox 3.6 or finding an alternative.

    As far as I can see this is a seriously braindead move on Mozilla's part, merely to keep up with Chrome's version numbers.
    Mozilla isn't responsible for addon developors failing to update their extensions. And they rarely actually "break", usually just need version number bump.

    Also the old firefox development model of releases filled with major changes is MORE likely to break stuff.

    All these stupid hyperbolic arguments about mozilla's new release schedule is making me rage.

    Firefox 4's development took WAY too long, and now they have a sane release schedule and people even bitch about that.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    Mozilla isn't responsible for addon developors failing to update their extensions. And they rarely actually "break", usually just need version number bump.
    Exactly. Mozilla forces the addons to tell it which versions they support. The addon developer has no idea whether it will work on Firefox-23, but they get blamed when Firefox increases the version number and the addons stop working.

    Also the old firefox development model of releases filled with major changes is MORE likely to break stuff.
    Which is exactly my point: you knew when major changes happened that might break things, so you could stick to the older version of the software and still get security updates until the new version had been proven to work.

    Not any more.

    All these stupid hyperbolic arguments about mozilla's new release schedule is making me rage.
    Good for you. The rest of us actually care more about software usability than having a rapid increase in version numbers.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by movieman View Post
    They care when their addons break and they're forced to upgrade to a new version because Mozilla no longer releases security updates for the one they released three months ago. That's likely to be a significant hit for corporate use where they only want to use software they've tested... guess they'll be sticking to Firefox 3.6 or finding an alternative.

    As far as I can see this is a seriously braindead move on Mozilla's part, merely to keep up with Chrome's version numbers.
    That's why FF5 adds the new Jetpack addon API. Use that and the upgrade problem should go away for extension developers.

    Since when was there any corporate use of Firefox anyway? They've been complaining since the beginning that they couldn't use Firefox until someone put out an msi based installer and allowed them to centrally manage it, and Mozilla never seemed to care about that.

    Anyway, you seem to be conflating 2 complaints here. 1 is that they are releasing more often. The other is that the version # is getting too big too fast.

    Your first complaint is valid - but there's a good reason they are doing this. Otherwise you end up with a situation like FF 3 where you are 12 months behind the competition for most of the year, and only get caught up for a month or two when you release.

    Your second complaint is stupid, who cares what the version # says. Would you really have been happier if they called it 4.1 instead of 5?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,273

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    Since when was there any corporate use of Firefox anyway?
    Linux/UNIX..

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •