Page 1 of 24 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 235

Thread: PathScale Open-Sources The EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,306

    Default PathScale Open-Sources The EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite

    Phoronix: PathScale Open-Sources The EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite

    Within the free software world, GCC has long been the dominant compiler with it being backed by the Free Software Foundation, it being the most well developed free compiler suite, and is a feature rich offering that is put out under the GNU GPLv3. As of late, LLVM has also been hitting the nail on the head. The Low-Level Virtual Machine with its C/C++ Clang compiler front-end offers great performance, is successful in building code-bases like the Linux kernel, its modular design allows the compiler infrastructure to be used in areas like graphics drivers, is under a BSD-style license, and carries numerous other advantages. Other open-source compilers have advanced too, including the release of PCC 1.0. Now there is a new and extremely interesting option to shake the open-source compiler world: PathScale is freely releasing the source to the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite. EKOPath 4 is a high-performance compiler that up until now has been proprietary and costs nearly $2000 USD per license, but now it's open-source and can sharply outperform GCC in many computationally-intense workloads.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16135

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    206

    Default

    holy **** this is nice.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Were both compilers run without optimizations or what were the options?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    574

    Default

    Considering you've been sitting on this article for two weeks, you could have gotten someone to proof read it

    The first line was particularly horrible to read

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Neeeeed ebuild.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    268

    Default compiler FTW!

    cant wait to see this thingy on my 2 gentoo boxes

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    268

    Default thanks

    thanks for really interesting news Michael!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FireBurn View Post
    Considering you've been sitting on this article for two weeks, you could have gotten someone to proof read it

    The first line was particularly horrible to read
    Quit being so pedantic and celebrate the good news!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3

    Default

    It would appear that Phoronix jumped the gun a bit here. So far, there's still nothing on the PathScale site and while a trusted source has told me that the release is still on for now, I'm kind of worried about the effect that the early leak will have...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    82

    Default How can such differences exist ?

    They are big differences in performance.
    Even if the applications have been well chosen, I would never expect to see such differences by just using another compiler.
    Maybe this should be considered as bugs in GCC (it must obviously do something wrong to see such a difference).

    That would be very interesting to compare compilations options, and to see how that works on different configurations as well.

    And why not using Fedora 15 with GCC 4.6 to perform benchmarks?
    It's a bit more bleeding edge than Ubuntu.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •