Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: The Linux 3.0 Kernel Will... Reboot Better?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,113

    Default The Linux 3.0 Kernel Will... Reboot Better?

    Phoronix: The Linux 3.0 Kernel Will... Reboot Better?

    Beyond file-system cleancache support, a Microsoft Kinect driver, Intel Ivy Bridge support, and various open-source graphics driver improvements, the Linux 3.0 kernel may also reboot your system better. Yes, really...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTUwOA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Linux needs to be rebooted?

    News to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LLStarks View Post
    Linux needs to be rebooted?

    News to me.
    Your aging, security-hole-ridden kernel and low-level user-space would probably appreciate it if you did a yum/apt-get upgrade and rebooted.

    It's like those fools who brag about how their "not IIS" webserver hasn't been restarted in two years. 15 seconds at apache.org, php.net, etc. gives you a laundry list of remote holes to gleefully exploit, if you're the mischievous type.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Ksplice does all of that work without forcing a reboot.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    76

    Default

    The article, throughout being rather long and consiting mostly of quotes, doesn't cover the contents of mjg59's blog post to the slightest degree. Michael please try to understand the matter you are posting about, before writing the article.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynxeye View Post
    The article, throughout being rather long and consiting mostly of quotes, doesn't cover the contents of mjg59's blog post to the slightest degree.
    What? The article was fine.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    590

    Default

    I sometimes wish Michael would just syndicate these blog posts into his site rather than trying to rewrite them. Articles on phoronix should be thought out researched and infromative, not a link fest with the words "leveraged" and "etc." added.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    267

    Default

    it turns out that on most systems the ACPI reboot vector points at 0xcf9 in system IO space.
    first: what is a reboot vector? I know what reboot means, I know what vector means...but throwing those words together doesn't make any sense to me.

    second why is it bad that it points @ 0xcf9? would be 0x1337 more appropriate?

    and what's the big deal about poking the keyboard controller? If I want my PC to reboot I want it to reboot. It should not poke itself o_0

    That's like saying your going to sleep and then, just before sleeping you masturbate. oh wait...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    What? The article was fine.
    So what does i.e.
    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    And, shockingly, it turns out that on most systems the ACPI reboot vector points at 0xcf9 in system IO space.
    say to you?

    Without the context given by the original blog post this are just words clung together. Random quotes from blogposts you dont understand don'tmake for a good article.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,122

    Default

    So... the default behavior is now to assume that you have broken hardware and treat it as such. Why not just feed the kernel a parameter that says "my hardware is a POS" to enable such moronic behavior?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •