Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Linux 3.0 Kernel May Remove Some Old Cruft

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pvtcupcakes View Post
    Either way, version numbers shouldn't be about features. This is what Linus has been saying since 2.6 was released. I don't think there should be a goal for the kernel to reach 3.0. If Linus wants to call 2.6.40 version 3.0 then that's good enough. 3.0 doesn't have to be special.
    Its not about features, its about the evolution of features. In a kernel series, you're pretty much doing add-add-add-add, so the new features keep piling on. You can generally expect forward compatibility. This would mark a new kernel that is not 100% forward compatible from 2.6. Go with the big number jump to denote this fact.

    Similarly, you can't always expect any 2.6 kernel to be a drop in replacement for a 2.4, 2.2, or 1.x. You *can* expect a 2.6.y kernel to be virtually a drop in replacement for 2.6.x where y>x though. See what I'm getting at?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    45

    Default

    I've always been frustrated that I need stuff from drivers/scsi to get my sata hard drives to work.

    Also, as far as I know, a lot of hardware, like sensors, still uses ISA.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    84

    Default

    ISA still useed there too, don't remove!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pvtcupcakes View Post
    Either way, version numbers shouldn't be about features. This is what Linus has been saying since 2.6 was released. I don't think there should be a goal for the kernel to reach 3.0. If Linus wants to call 2.6.40 version 3.0 then that's good enough. 3.0 doesn't have to be special.
    Who Cares? I really don't get why people are so wrapped up in version numbers these days...

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roland View Post
    I've always been frustrated that I need stuff from drivers/scsi to get my sata hard drives to work.

    Also, as far as I know, a lot of hardware, like sensors, still uses ISA.
    That's because of the driver model that makes IDE/SATA drives appear like SCSI devices

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    343

    Default

    clean old stuff

    if you need ancient hardware, use linux 2.6
    for modern use 3.0

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RavFX View Post
    ISA still useed there too, don't remove!
    If you use it, and want to continue doing so, you might want to make your case on the LKML.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    That's because of the driver model that makes IDE/SATA drives appear like SCSI devices
    I get that, but it's a fundamental change I'd like to see. Lets call things as they are. make nconfig is pretty enormous as it is.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default

    So I guess Pentium 3, and Athlon systems are now too old since many of those motherboards included ISA expansions slots.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rapsure View Post
    So I guess Pentium 3, and Athlon systems are now too old since many of those motherboards included ISA expansions slots.
    Modern motherboards use an ISA bus for small devices like sensors even though they do not have a physical slot.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industr...embedded_chips
    Last edited by roland; 05-24-2011 at 05:16 PM. Reason: got a nice link

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •