Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Legal Threats Against MPlayer, Server To Disappear

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loonyphoenix View Post
    I think the implication is rather obvious.
    False dichotomy. You are assuming that any fork that isn't clearly a good move therefore is clearly a bad move. You ignore the third possibility: we just can't tell at this point and with the information available whether the fork was good or bad. That is how I read that paragraph, and in fact it took me a few moments to figure out why people were talking about "bad forks" since it didn't occur to me to read it that way.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBlackCat View Post
    False dichotomy. You are assuming that any fork that isn't clearly a good move therefore is clearly a bad move. You ignore the third possibility: we just can't tell at this point and with the information available whether the fork was good or bad. That is how I read that paragraph, and in fact it took me a few moments to figure out why people were talking about "bad forks" since it didn't occur to me to read it that way.
    It gave ME the impression that mplayer2 or libav were somehow blamed for the whole episode, otherwise why mention forks at all?

    Of course, knowing Phoronix, one might deduce that those are simply pointless plugs of previous articles... which is confusing. If you're linking something, it has to do with the article in some fashion, IMHO.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Shouldn't the FSF jump in and protect these guys?, they seem to be threatened, this is very bad for the project.
    About the forking, the project might not be healthy, because developers can't really have fun while doing it, because they get menaces from big companies, so the project stalls(a bit at least) and there are some people who DO want to keep going, so they fork.
    If no legal thread would happen, and people in there get to talk more, I think those forks wouldn't be needed.
    So please FSF jump in and say something.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jcgeny View Post
    Mplayer is very good despite its cmdline style that does not help noobs to discover this good software .
    wish him to be back when all get cleared
    There's great mplayer front end - SMPlayer.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    627

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by damipereira View Post
    Shouldn't the FSF jump in and protect these guys?, they seem to be threatened, this is very bad for the project.
    About the forking, the project might not be healthy, because developers can't really have fun while doing it, because they get menaces from big companies, so the project stalls(a bit at least) and there are some people who DO want to keep going, so they fork.
    If no legal thread would happen, and people in there get to talk more, I think those forks wouldn't be needed.
    So please FSF jump in and say something.
    Do you really think FSF is reading this forum?

  6. #16

    Default

    FSF members don't ever read fsf bugzilla.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loonyphoenix View Post
    It gave ME the impression that mplayer2 or libav were somehow blamed for the whole episode, otherwise why mention forks at all?
    To point out that there have been many notable forks lately perhaps? Nobody can tell how a fork will pan out after a few weeks. You are a just a "glass half empty" kind of person and read into it something that wasn't said.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBlackCat View Post
    That is how I read that paragraph, and in fact it took me a few moments to figure out why people were talking about "bad forks" since it didn't occur to me to read it that way.
    Same thing here.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    91

    Default

    I think you meant:

    "While legal threats to free software projects would be disastrous to those seeking to encourage Linux and open-source work"

    or maybe:

    "While legal threats to free software projects would be great for those seeking to destory Linux and open-source work"

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    845

    Default

    From what I gather, Attila Kinali was one of the main instigators in the libav 'fork' (well, attempted hostile takeover actually) so I can't help but wonder if this mplayer spat is a result of that (seems the projects share a number of developers). There certainly seems to be alot of bad blood in the mplayer/ffmpeg developer pool of late. Of course there are always two sides to this, and one side is never totally right/wrong.

    Maybe we will have some light shed on these matters as the dust settles.

    As for those taking the higher ground and declaring it a soap opera, these are people just like you and me. We certainly set no higher examples in these forums so why would we expect it from anyone else? And having worked as a programmer for the majority of my working-life I can attest that ego-driven confrontations is nothing out of the ordinary, in my own experience particularly programmers vs management has been a never-ending battle of will's.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •