Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 117

Thread: The Open-Source ATI Driver Is Becoming A Lot Faster

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    631

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    The results in more challenging games which use lots of GLSL (like Nexuiz) are far more telling. It's amazing that we're that close to Catalyst.
    Except that Nexuiz in PTS doesn't use GLSL. If GLSL was enabled, r300g would be totally kicking ass, it would be like twice or three times faster than r300c. Enable GLSL in Nexuiz and try it yourself: "nexuiz -nosound -benchmark demos/demo2"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,114

    Default

    Nice review. Also liked the comparison to Catalyst. Is it safe to assume than in a year´s time we will get near performance parity (or better yet, better performance) in 3D operations?

  3. #13

    Default

    As someone who uses an Nvidia graphics card on Gentoo Linux, I am not sure how to interpret these results. Is Stock Ubuntu 10.10 using the open source driver or the proprietary driver?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    843

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by birdie View Post
    please, add CPU usage stats.
    Yep, that would be a good idea.

    But good to see the free drivers catching up, so soon <R600 users won't miss much performance. Though the classic mesa stuff seemed to be quite ok, too. And nobody has to stay with an outdated fglrx/distributionfor performance anymore.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    Nice review. Also liked the comparison to Catalyst. Is it safe to assume than in a year´s time we will get near performance parity (or better yet, better performance) in 3D operations?
    No.

    10char.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    543

    Default

    Marek, does adding multi-threading to Mesa will improve things much? I think returning sooner in gl* calls(in which that makes sense ofcourse) in the 3D app, and do driver work in separate thread(s) will improve speed of command stream flow. I am by no means 3D developer(driver or app), but my threading background from other areas tells me that. Is that right?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Toronto/North Bay Canada
    Posts
    877

    Default

    raise your hand if you bout an r300 card in the last 5 years.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    306

    Default

    I have an R350 LOL... on an AGP 2x board with dual PII .. its horribly under powered cpu wise... so multithreading with definitely help. Still haven't tried the recent updates I bet they will help alot.

    openarena does good to hit 15-20fps at the very lowest settings it is the atlantis model of the 9800 though so its not nearly as fast as the 9800 with the usual 256bit memory bus anyway.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,938

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by L33F3R View Post
    raise your hand if you bout an r300 card in the last 5 years.
    This driver powers r400 and r500 cards too.

    And some of these optimisations will eventually land in the r600g driver, which supports everything after that.

    So it's very much relevant, even if you don't think that it's excellent that they can match the proprietary driver already, which is quite a feat.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default

    So when you run old hardware with games that it can barely run, then "The Open-Source ATI Driver Is Becoming A Lot Faster" ???

    /phoronix fail

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •