Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Will Intel's Sandy Bridge & P67 Play Well With Linux?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,718

    Default

    a) that was in ages ago.
    b) that 'virtual device' is just a known chip adressed differently. You can even access it without that driver.

    I have such a board

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    a) that was in ages ago.
    b) that 'virtual device' is just a known chip adressed differently. You can even access it without that driver.

    I have such a board

    a) Not really ages ago, the patch was submitted to lmsensors late 2009 and the device has been around for the better part of 4 years. b) the "virtual device" handles more then just sensor support and also hooks into the ACPI. It also handles items like fan speed, clock adjustments, voltage adjustments, etc. Before the patch was introduced you would get conflicting addresses between the two "devices" as they were both trying to address the same locations.

    I have 6 such boards of different models with this device.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Only the new H67 chipset will support Intel's on-die graphics, the P67 is used with a discrete graphics card.

    I'm hoping for an Asus (or other high quality) microATX H67 board I can build a new Linux workstation around.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    Yes, only H and Q boards have got the needed connectors. P does not. When you want to use every game you will most likely need a dedicated card, for some simples ones onboard might be enough. But intel Linux drivers have been always slower than the Win drivers for games, so more interesting will be libva support - and i want to see vc1 too... When you look at the libva git log you will see h264+mpeg2 for sandy bridge already:

    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libva/log/

    I did not test my i5-680 lately, if somebody has got one H5 board too much send it to me... But when i tested it vlc was not able to use DXVA2 correctly - libva was better, but i only tested hd samples.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Yes, only H and Q boards have got the needed connectors. P does not. When you want to use every game you will most likely need a dedicated card, for some simples ones onboard might be enough. But intel Linux drivers have been always slower than the Win drivers for games, so more interesting will be libva support - and i want to see vc1 too... When you look at the libva git log you will see h264+mpeg2 for sandy bridge already:

    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libva/log/

    I did not test my i5-680 lately, if somebody has got one H5 board too much send it to me... But when i tested it vlc was not able to use DXVA2 correctly - libva was better, but i only tested hd samples.
    I don't know, the benchmarks from Anandtech a couple of months back showed some pretty serious improvement on the integrated graphics side. It's not like there's a lot of high end games for our linux boxes which require the latest and greatest discrete solutions. My 9800GT still chews through almost anything I throw at it, most of the time even stuff running under wine.

    I am very interested in the benchmarks under linux. I'm pretty positive I'll be upgrading my HTPC (from an X2 @ 2,4 ghz/integrated gf7050) using one of these processors, depending on how well-supported they are shortly after launch. I'm guessing I'm not alone in those plans.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    wtf?

    In many years I never encountered a board where the sensor chip was not supported.
    LM_Sensors still doesn't report voltages and fan speeds for my ages old EP45-DS4 (from experience with other cards, it doesn't support many cards in terms of voltage or fan speeds). LM_Sensors doesn't even reports the temperatures on a Thinkpad T410 (i5 540), which is completely retarded on a laptop.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    209

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    .. But intel Linux drivers have been always slower than the Win drivers for games...
    No suprises here..

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    401

    Default

    Hmmmm "More information next month."

    You missed out on "More information next year."

    HAPPY NEW YEAR!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default Intel's AVX in Linux

    As a bonus, while Windows 7 SP1 is not released yet, Linux had Intel AVX support for more than a year!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,718

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    LM_Sensors still doesn't report voltages and fan speeds for my ages old EP45-DS4 (from experience with other cards, it doesn't support many cards in terms of voltage or fan speeds). LM_Sensors doesn't even reports the temperatures on a Thinkpad T410 (i5 540), which is completely retarded on a laptop.
    on laptops that is usually done with acpi stuff. Really.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •