Page 3 of 23 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 225

Thread: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    20

    Default

    I followed this development from the first version and indeed it seems that everything is very smooth.
    The real good thing is that background tasks (system tasks) dont interfere with the user environment ('cause they are isolated in another group).

    This is achieved by the cfs scheduler that isoletes tasks belonging to the same tty.

    There is also the solution proposed by systemd or cgroups (made in user-space) but Linus stated that that would be not the solution
    1) user-space is a fragmented mess;
    2) user-space daemons are a total mess;
    3) the whole "user space is more flexible" is just a lie
    ([URL="http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/15/561"].

    Other than that, for what concernes IO bandwith isolation, take a look at what Mike is saying: "Next logical auto-step would be to try to subvert cfq" http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/15/155. Perhaps he is joking .

    Marco

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    Why on earth was the test done with -j64... Use the amount of cores in the system. The test doesn't make sense otherwise. No one compiles kernels with -j64. Everyone uses the amount of cores plus something. Never 64.

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Why on earth was the test done with -j64... Use the amount of cores in the system. The test doesn't make sense otherwise. No one compiles kernels with -j64. Everyone uses the amount of cores plus something. Never 64.
    It was to simulate heavy load.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    72

    Default

    nice!

    Anyone could share the .deb packages for the 2.6.36 kernel compiled with this patch for x64?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Actually, shouldn't there be a quick and easy way on Ubuntu to apt-get source the kernel, apply the patch and build the deb?

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimatrix View Post
    Actually, shouldn't there be a quick and easy way on Ubuntu to apt-get source the kernel, apply the patch and build the deb?
    There is. It is known as a terminal window.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shining Arcanine View Post
    There is. It is known as a terminal window.
    Hahah X D

    Not my thing playing the linux elitist, but c'mon, if people want to try something that isn't even released they should be prepared to make a minimum effort instead of crying for PPAs or what not.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yotambien View Post
    Hahah X D

    Not my thing playing the linux elitist, but c'mon, if people want to try something that isn't even released they should be prepared to make a minimum effort instead of crying for PPAs or what not.
    Ubuntu has spoiled users like that now.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    99

    Default

    I've always avoided group scheduling. Running Gentoo, there were numerous reports of bad response in the forums beginning whenever they added group scheduling, and the basic response ever since then has been to configure it out. To be fair, I've been under the impression that group scheduling needed a userspace daemon in order to make it work right, and I've never seen anything for that other than one prototype.

    So is this a way to make group scheduling work without the userspace daemon?

    Wonder if there'll be a backport patch, and how far back it can go.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yotambien View Post
    Hahah X D

    Not my thing playing the linux elitist, but c'mon, if people want to try something that isn't even released they should be prepared to make a minimum effort instead of crying for PPAs or what not.
    I had the same thoughts when i read those comments...

    I am not an elitist, on the contrary i tend to help in every way i can users of a lower grade of knowledge than mine. But seriously, it is like asking to perform a brain surgery without knowing even how to do first aid...

    If you want to play with the big boys, be willing to learn a few things first...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •