11-13-2010, 05:32 PM
Well, I have to admit... I myself like trolling sometimes. Trolling makes us answer the what ifs in life, and makes us better for it.
Originally Posted by NomadDemon
11-15-2010, 01:55 PM
you might not give a shit about java - and you are a very small minority. If debian is so great for musicians - why are there debian forks for musicians?
And please don't try to tell me that the pulseaudio infection in ubuntu is a good thing.
11-15-2010, 03:02 PM
11-18-2010, 03:04 PM
11-18-2010, 04:00 PM
i also use linux for music.. but i use ubuntu studio in studio, and normal ubuntu with ubu studio repo in my room
yea yea.. bitching on ubuntu START
02-09-2011, 02:56 PM
How far into the future?
The question begs, though - how *far* into the future could Wayland be in position to replace X.org under Unity?
Originally Posted by phoronix
X.org supports more hardware than Wayland does by far - and I'm referring *just* to display hardware a year old or less. X+Mesa 7.10 supports - and with DRI at minimum - all but the most recent AMD GPUs (HD6xxx). Desktop, portable/Mobility, all can use one of two drivers today - r300g or r600c (with r600g being worked on). However, Canonical has decided to use X+r600g - despite being quite aware that r600c is still eating Gallium's lunch on the newer hardware. In fact, r600c has, in typical desktop usage, tied, if not actually begun beating, FGLRX performance metrics - something I never expected to see. And Gallium is *ahead* of Wayland.
Tags for this Thread