Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: What Parts Of X.Org Should Be Killed With Fire?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,405

    Default What Parts Of X.Org Should Be Killed With Fire?

    Phoronix: What Parts Of X.Org Should Be Killed With Fire?

    Originally at the X.Org Developers' Summit here in Toulouse this week there was going to be a talk entitled "Kill It With Fire" where Corbin Simpson (mostly known for his work on the ATI R300 Gallium3D driver) was going to be speaking about what drivers or parts of X.Org should be eliminated from the stack. This talk though is no longer occurring, in part as Corbin is no longer in attendance; he washed his US passport in the laundry...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODYxMA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    "Corbin is no longer in attendance; he washed his US passport in the laundry."

    This is a Microsoft conspiracy. They have people inside the CIA and were able to destroy his passport. This in an attempt to keep X.Org from modernizing itself so that it can't compete with the MS Windows GUI stack.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    433

    Default

    I'm glad that it seems they're not talking about removing DDX drivers for older hardware. Believe it or not, I'm still using the Trident Cyberblade driver in one of my machines. There was an experimental 3D driver written for it but it never went official. I can live without the 3D though.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,099

    Default :P

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    "Corbin is no longer in attendance; he washed his US passport in the laundry."

    This is a Microsoft conspiracy. They have people inside the CIA and were able to destroy his passport. This in an attempt to keep X.Org from modernizing itself so that it can't compete with the MS Windows GUI stack.
    Also Mono, Gnome, Novell, Miguel.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    RealNC is figuratively on crack. Although we all know that Michael conveniantly withhold the part where this Gnome thing running on top of X was also part of "Killing it with fire" because it's an inferior codebase. Ofcourse Novell is in bed with Microsoft so they at least support a good DE like KDE. Let's hope Microsoft will not sue other distributions with the silly "running a respectful DE"-patent

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,725

    Default

    > What parts of X should be killed with fire?

    > None. But on the other hand, in this other project called the kernel...

    The presentation wouldn't have been very on-topic, looks to me :P

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Also Mono, Gnome, Novell, Miguel.
    This doesn't help. Mono is MS .net implementiation, Miguel works for MS, Novell has a pact with MS, so your and similar people tactics of understimating things simply won't help.

    http://www.novell.com/linux/ximian.html

    You know what ximian was/is, don't you?


    What parts of X should be killed with fire?

    None. But on the other hand, in this other project called the kernel...
    I'd kill non-KMS support where KMS support is available.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    What parts to kill seems very implementation dependent. Knowing nothing about the specifics I cannot say. If Xorg is well designed then more code shouldn't necessarily get in the way. If it's badly designed, then rearrange the structure so that you don't have to decide which parts to kill in order to make the rest of it not suck.

    I'm having enough trouble understanding X from the outside let alone the inside. I'm much more excited about the announcement somebody is working on organizing the documentation TBH.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chewi View Post
    I'm glad that it seems they're not talking about removing DDX drivers for older hardware. Believe it or not, I'm still using the Trident Cyberblade driver in one of my machines.
    And I'm using the mga driver with an old pci based millenium G200.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    433

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devius View Post
    And I'm using the mga driver with an old pci based millenium G200.
    Haha yeah, mine's not quite that old. I almost bought that card... in 1999.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •