Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: A CUDA Back-End For Intel's Open-Source Driver?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,388

    Default A CUDA Back-End For Intel's Open-Source Driver?

    Phoronix: A CUDA Back-End For Intel's Open-Source Driver?

    While there is the "Clover" branch of Mesa started by Zack Rusin for providing an OpenCL state tracker that can be used by Gallium3D hardware drivers, it hasn't yet amounted to much. The OpenCL state tracker is not yet working, hasn't been touched in months, and has yet to be integrated in the mainline Mesa code-base. However, as another GPGPU alternative, it looks like a CUDA back-end that's specific to Intel's open-source driver may end up being worked on...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODM2Mg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Seriously, Cuda? On Intel IGP's? Am I the only one who thinks this is one of the most stupid ways of burning recources that could be used a lot better somewhere else?

    I mean; hardly anyone uses Cuda and those who do probably need a lot more then a miserable Intel IGP will offer. So who is going to use this? What is the point of making this?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    258

    Default

    Just another proof that the graphic stack development for linux is, generally speaking, clueless.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    14

    Default

    I think you two are clueless. This is a group of researchers interested in experimenting with GPGPU backends. They're probably not interested in what you're interested in. They're interested in IGPs specifically because they feel that CPU-GPU integration is relevant to their research. Nobody said they were releasing anything or contributing anything to the Intel driver...

    It's not brain surgery here, the guy's mail to the list is only 3 paragraphs long.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    don't waste your time on intel or nvidia get that stuff: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06...pu//print.html

    Passiv cooled :-)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    111

    Default

    I don't get it.

    If they are really that intersted into CPU/GPU stuff why strive for CUDA that was designed for GPU only?

    I mean hack, OpenCL was at least designed with CPU in mind.
    Yeah I know that to get very good performance you still have to write code specifically for CPU or certain types of GPUs, but still why CUDA?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Why? Because they can and any knowledge can be usefull for noveau. Next.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Why? Because they can and any knowledge can be usefull for noveau. Next.
    Wow. Great argument.

    So people working on Intel drivers are supposed to get the knowledge for an driver for NVidia cards?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    629

    Default

    This news is actually pretty cool.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marek View Post
    This news is actually pretty cool.
    Yeah, it's pretty cool, but I'd also like to see them put their efforts into finishing off the OpenCL state tracker.

    Although, if they manage to get a working CUDA backend for the intel driver, then someone might be able to do like Nvidia does and provide an OpenCL -> CUDA wrapper/translator, which might be portable to other GPU architectures in the open source stack.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •