Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

stumped - xorg edgers + 2.6.35-rc1 DRI fail

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • stumped - xorg edgers + 2.6.35-rc1 DRI fail

    Hi all,

    On 10.4 with the latest xorg edgers updates (+ libdrm epoch bump fix) and latest ubuntu mainline (2.6.35-rc1) on my rv635 (Tosh_IEC_Potomac_M86_DDR2 M86 GDDR2_16Mx16 128bit 256MB 600e/500m); I seem to be booting into swrast mode. 2.6.34 mainline does not exhibit this problem, checking out the xorg.0.log shows:

    [ 26.161] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
    [ 26.161] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable
    [ 26.255] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so

    Has something broken DRI recently? (Firmware is definitely there)

  • #2
    Put dmesg output on boot and X.org log into pastebin or whatever and link to this?

    Comment


    • #3
      You just went to far with the "testing part" - that's all.

      Comment


      • #4
        Same here.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by nanonyme View Post
          Put dmesg output on boot and X.org log into pastebin or whatever and link to this?
          xorg.0.log - http://pastebin.org/305908
          dmesg - http://pastebin.org/305912

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by hmmm View Post
            radeon drm module isn't loaded.

            Comment


            • #7
              cheers; working now - passing radeon.dynpm=1 at boot was stopping it from loading.

              Comment


              • #8
                That's interesting. Maybe the radeon module should be made to rather ignore unknown options?

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have the same issue with drm-next and 2.6.35-rc1. If radeon.dynpm=1 is set the drm fails to load, bacause of "unknown option dynpm".
                  I guess even if dynpm is on by default it still should not happen.

                  2.6.34 works fine.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The option was removed in 2.6.35 as the dynpm can now be dynamically set via sysfs. It's a general property of kernel modules to fail if an invalid option is provided; not something specific to radeon.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X