Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: PowerMizer Is Not Likely The Problem In 256.xx Issue

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,110

    Default PowerMizer Is Not Likely The Problem In 256.xx Issue

    Phoronix: PowerMizer Is Not Likely The Problem In 256.xx Issue

    One of the articles published on Phoronix this week was NVIDIA's 256.25 Beta Linux Driver Slows Things Down? With NVIDIA's first 256.xx Linux beta driver we encountered significant performance drops from a ZaReason notebook with a NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M graphics processor. Some thought that PowerMizer was to blame, but this does not appear to be the case...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODI5Nw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    maybe the 256 beta was built with debugging flags?

    but that doesn't explain why some people don't notice regressions.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    358

    Default

    the mistary continues

    Nice response test.
    Cheers

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,173

    Default

    Couldn't it still be a powermizer issue where the driver is doing something fancy like limiting the number of commands it sends to the GPU?

    I don't know, i just think that plugging in the AC and checking that it isn't downclocking may not be enough to rule it out.

    Do you not have any desktop cards you can check?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    260

    Default

    what about the OS?
    with all the backporting madness at ubuntu....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    260

    Default

    sry for the double post

    and what about amd processor?

    (sry for being a noob XD)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Ya I would like to see this test done on a discreet card. Something isn't jiving here. One person reported slower performance on nvnet and the rest are reporting back that it actually is faster.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    It's also entirely possible it's a distro specific issue (which wouldn't surprise me at all).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    The performance regression is present on my system as well:

    - Debian Sid
    - x86_64
    - GNOME 2.28 / Metacity
    - custom built kernel 2.6.33.4

    NVidia 190.53: Everything fine, with and without a compositing window manager

    NVidia 195.36.24: A single OpenGL application still works ok but slows down the rest of the GUI. Activating compositing yields abysmal performance.

    NVidia 256.25: Somewhat better than 195.36.24 but still noticable slowdowns when running more than one application at a time.

    So far the old 190.53 series delivers the best perceived speed on my system. (NVidia GTX 260 card)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    358

    Default

    guys/gals do post test results as well to backup your claims either for slowdowns or speedups or else simple 'impressions' might not be anything else but placebo

    get the latest Unigine Sanctuary / Tropics / Heaven or LightsMark and do test them with each driver version on your system at this moment

    if you don't bother to test why bother to post?

    Thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •