Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: OpenSUSE Says Farewell To RadeonHD Driver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,391

    Default OpenSUSE Says Farewell To RadeonHD Driver

    Phoronix: OpenSUSE Says Farewell To RadeonHD Driver

    The RadeonHD Linux driver that came about in 2007 following the announcement of AMD's open-source driver strategy has had an interesting history. This driver was developed by Novell's developers, but now they are even dropping it from their openSUSE distribution...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODIwOQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Hard to say goodbye but i hope the Novel Devs work now on "radeon".

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    this is bond to happen, two drivers for the same thing is bad, especially when developer man power is lacking

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Well, this is not really surprising, is it? Everybody knew that would happen sooner or later.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    578

    Default

    Finally something that should have never existed disappeared. What a damn waste of time and man power.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    Finally something that should have never existed disappeared. What a damn waste of time and man power.
    i wouldn't call it a waste, even though i never used it.

    it was an attempt to rewrite ati driver from scratch for new generation of cards. it got proven wrong by classic ati driver team. nothing wrong with that. besides radeonhd team was not that big to start with, and shared some developers with the other team.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    780

    Default

    IIRC the ati KMS driver picked up code from the radeonHD codebase, so it's not a complete loss.

    Maybe we'd be further if they had concentrated on radeon from the beginning, but it's too late for that anyway.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    565

    Default Why not merge?

    How hard would it be to merge any interesting bits from radeonhd and go from there?

    Folks, Open Source software evolves like this. Many related ideas/projects pop up, one will be strongest and survive, but you couldn't have told a priori. The model has proven incredibly successful. A large chunk of the computing hardware (from embedded to big iron) runs open source software, mostly GPL type. That ranges from cellphones to supercomputers. So, again, it is what it is and it works. It just gets a little bit to get used to it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mendieta View Post
    How hard would it be to merge any interesting bits from radeonhd and go from there?
    I believe radeon has atleast the same functionality, so there aren't any interesting bits...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    629

    Default

    Wondering how much money Novell has invested in this project.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •