Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,395

    Default Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

    Phoronix: Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

    If using the latest ATI open-source driver Git code for kernel mode-setting, there may be slightly better X-Video support without any visual slowdowns/problems. Pauli Nieminen has changed around the code so that a video buffer is allocated in the GTT (Graphics Translation Table) to provide faster memory operations that haven't been accelerated by KMS. The patch that provides the performance boost to X-Video under ATI kernel mode-setting can be found on the xorg-driver-ati mailing list and has since been committed...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Nzk4NA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    What they really need to speed up is basic 2D accel. Still, any speed improvement with KMS is a good thing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    What they really need to speed up is basic 2D accel. Still, any speed improvement with KMS is a good thing.
    EXA is already relatively fast, and even my lowly RV710 runs Compiz smoothly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    With KMS? My HD4850 is chocking with simple 2D tasks. On my older card it's not as bad though.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    Xv was already working very good here. One of the areas where the oss driver really shines compared to fglrx. But of course any improvement is still welcome

    And I agree that EXA under KMS could use some speed improvement. I'm now in the situation where I have 2 screens, one fully accelerated EXA/Xv/3D, and one with only shadowfb 'acceleration'. Many 2D operations are much faster with shadowfb than with EXA acceleration.

    There are also at least two bug reports regarding this:

    http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
    http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26225

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Xv works fine for the most part, except for some videos where it simply won't play or cause the players to crash. That Planet Earth birds clip that everyone likes for example. Interestingly enough, if I use the mplayer build from here it plays fine; smooth playback actually, despite my CPU usage going up the roof (not even even fglrx plays that clip that well without having to resort to XvBA).
    And yeah, that FireFox issue has been driving me nuts. Good thing I have been moving to Chrome.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    With KMS?
    No, I'm still running UMS until I get a legitimate reason to run KMS.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    215

    Default

    Now we're waiting for some tests UMS vs KMS on Radeon cards R300-R700.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    I did a small 2D test a while ago with my 200M. Been meaning to do one with my HD4850, but the damn thing takes so long to finish . Will cook up one for Xv as well latter this week.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    215

    Default

    Thanks Melcar. Unfortunately it doesn't look too optimistic for KMS (yet). I thought that now the performance of KMS with R300-R500 will be at least as good as UMS/non-KMS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •