Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: X Server 1.8 Release Candidate Is Here

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,698

    Default X Server 1.8 Release Candidate Is Here

    Phoronix: X Server 1.8 Release Candidate Is Here

    Keith Packard has just made available the first release candidate of X Server 1.8 and confirms that its release schedule is still on track. Snapshots and the Git code for X Server 1.8 go back to last year, but with a planned release by the end of March, Keith has now started working on release candidates...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Nzk4MA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    127

    Default

    I just use Ubuntu, so I never have any problems with AMD drivers not supporting newer stuff. However, it would be nice if AMD provided some preliminary support for new kernels and X server releases. If only to make sure half of the trolling on these forums about their drivers would be something from the past .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heiko View Post
    I just use Ubuntu, so I never have any problems with AMD drivers not supporting newer stuff.
    I just use Windows 7. It works like a charm. Those trolls here claiming Catalyst doesn't support this and that are getting on my nerves.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    but it will be many months before AMD is likely to support this updated X Server in their Catalyst Linux driver (they still lack support for X Server 1.7).
    What is it you don't understand about the SUPPORTED distributions in the Catalyst Install Instructions?

    Code:
    Operating Systems Distributions Supported
    
    The latest version of the ATI Proprietary Linux driver is designed to support the
            following Linux distributions:
             Red Hat Enterprise Linux suite
             Novell/SuSE product suite
             Ubuntu
    Why do you always bash AMD/ATi?

    I think you should have a big banner on the frontpage:

    Code:
    Fanboy of Intel, nVidia and Ubuntu
    Code:
    Supporter of closed source nVidia drivers over open source AMD drivers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    Why do you always bash AMD/ATi?
    I thought I was paranoid..

  6. #6

    Default

    Does anybody know if there is going to be a PPA package of this for Ubuntu? I tried to make one, but it would need so many other dependencies that I was afraid of screwing up my system.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    Why do you always bash AMD/ATi?
    Because they are always late by a couple of months with supporting new software in comparison to Nvidia. Why can Nvidia provide drivers working with the latest kernel and X server while ATI can't do that?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Because Nvidia had a headstart of several years before Ati really started working on OpenGL (first) and their Linux drivers (later).

    Then again, AMD now provides open-source drivers that support the latest kernel and X-Server before it is even released. So yeah.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    What is it you don't understand about the SUPPORTED distributions in the Catalyst Install Instructions?

    Code:
    Operating Systems Distributions Supported
    
    The latest version of the ATI Proprietary Linux driver is designed to support the
            following Linux distributions:
             Red Hat Enterprise Linux suite
             Novell/SuSE product suite
             Ubuntu
    Why do you always bash AMD/ATi?
    There's no need to defend the indefensible. Really, leave that to bridgman, he gets payed for that. Linux Catalyst is a joke and deserves to be mocked. Yes there's work in progress on an oss driver, but these are two separate things. Really, it's okay to appreciate the work going on on the oss driver and bash the Linux Catalyst joke at the same time.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    What is it you don't understand about the SUPPORTED distributions in the Catalyst Install Instructions?

    Why do you always bash AMD/ATi?
    Because their crappy binary driver forces me to think that they deserve it.

    I think you should have a big banner on the frontpage:

    Code:
    Fanboy of Intel, nVidia and Ubuntu
    Code:
    Supporter of working and closed source nVidia drivers over bloated and unstable binary AMD drivers (and open source AMD drivers which are not ready for R500+)
    Fixed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •