Originally posted by Gizmot
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reasoning for closed source
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gizmot View PostAt the same time, you know that there is a bunch of very talented FOSS guys bashing their head on how to reverse engineer some hardware.
Originally posted by Gizmot View PostSo then, in God's name, dont they just open their close source drivers, pay some developpers (and get a crap load of free work from FOSS developpers) and developp a generic multiplatform driver that would be easy to port on easy platform?
Comment
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostWell lets put it this way, I design boats as well as my computing life, manufacturing wise that is simple as it takes typically less then 4 hours to assemble a boat but to gain that extra 5 mph out of the hull it took 18 months of analysis, design and simulations to find that "sweet spot spec" that allowed that performance difference. Assembly wise it made no difference. I guess it all depends on the product being designed. Ask any farmer as well about what they would do about their combine if they had a chance to talk to the engineer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nille View PostThey don?t need to reverse engineer the driver because AMD give the specs to the Devs and if something undocumented you can ask the AMD ppl.
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nille View PostThey don?t need to reverse engineer the driver because AMD give the specs to the Devs and if something undocumented you can ask the AMD ppl.
Some of the "radeon" driver devs are employed by AMD an some by Redhad an AMD partner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gizmot View Postwell, your exemple assume heavy R&D using actual production tooling. Could be wrong, but I was assuming that hardware was split in R&D between elementary science, new product engineering and manufacturing technology.
Comment
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostActually all the boats are assembled with about $300 worth of hand tools found at your local Home Depot. Assembly was never really a concern.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gizmot View PostOh, I tought you were talking about Cup of America style of boats. Because I do work as ''metrology'' engineer, and in every industry I have seen, about as much time is spent on ''how to build the dam thing'' than on the actual conception. if not more
The boats I designed were actually "extensions" to personal water craft (seadoos as referred by some). Take a formula 1 boat or a deep V but use a PWC as a powerplant and you get the idea of the mass number of options available. Mounting brackets cost to produce about $20 to make and was installed with a rachet and a wrench but the R&D that went towards the proper mounting height, alignment, etc far exceeded the materials, mold and manpower it took to produce those.
Comment
-
Comment