Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: Yahoo Pays Canonical, Now They're The Ubuntu Default

  1. #11

    Default

    So essentially, Canonical just made a deal with Yahoo to use Microsoft(R) Bing (R) to do web searches on Linux? I'll stick with Google, thank you.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Wtf is Yahoo!?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl333r View Post
    I beg to differ, at least a lot of their apps are not open source (Google Earth, their search infrastructure etc etc), so if that's "completely open source friendly" then how do we call companies that are actually 100% open source friendly? "Super mega duper open source friendly"??
    i knew someone would say that.

    we call google "completely open source friendly".
    we call other companies "completely open source"

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Hmmm, this might provide motivation for google to switch to another distro as their "linux of choice" for development.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thefirstm View Post
    So essentially, Canonical just made a deal with Yahoo to use Microsoft(R) Bing (R) to do web searches on Linux? I'll stick with Google, thank you.
    I'll also stick with Google, not because I have anything against Bing. But simply because in my experience Google's search engine is better and more usable than the alternatives around.

    I do like to see some more competition though. Google is getting a little too big.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Good for Canonical! They have done a great job and this seams like a good way to make money. I will continue to use startpage for my search engine though.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Interesting news! I wonder though how much $.

  8. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    I'll also stick with Google, not because I have anything against Bing. But simply because in my experience Google's search engine is better and more usable than the alternatives around.

    I do like to see some more competition though. Google is getting a little too big.
    Google is big, yes. But open-source friendly. Microsoft is bigger, and actively deters the development of open-source software.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Hmmm, this might provide motivation for google to switch to another distro as their "linux of choice" for development.
    That kind of was my thinking there too, deanjo...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    I'll also stick with Google, not because I have anything against Bing. But simply because in my experience Google's search engine is better and more usable than the alternatives around.

    I do like to see some more competition though. Google is getting a little too big.
    What kind of competition? It seems to me that search quality is not the competition. Only Google is providing such high quality search results. If the "competition" is competing then they aren't doing it in a way that benefits the consumer. Not if they aren't competing in quality, cost, or some other consumer measurable benefit.

    As to the size of Google, what is the critical mass that makes an organization bad? I don't see how size is necessarily proportional to evil. There are plenty of bad organizations in every size bracket, big and small.

    I'm not seeing competition that's attractive to me and size doesn't always matter.

    It also seems to me that Bing and Yahoo would do better to start competing for more than just the default slot. Google made it to the top without having that benefit. I think that says a lot. It also seems like the default game is all that MS and Yahoo are interested in playing. It isn't working but that's all they seem to be interested in.

    On one hand I'm glad that Canonical can plunder some of the blunder. On the other hand I wish the blunder wasn't there at all.

    Edit: Another thought on size: Ubuntu is the biggest Linux. Does that mean they are also the evil Linux?
    Last edited by Jimmy; 01-27-2010 at 12:33 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •