Thank you for allyour interesting answers.
Good. Full of hope for the future.
I am interested in this laptop : VAIO VGN-FW54E
It is based on Intel motherboard. Is it really a problem as it has been suggested ? Is the card enough powerfull to handle 1080p ?
Indeed, HD decode (with speed and tear free) is the main feature I am looking for. 3D performance are not that important.
I guess experiences vary. I haven't had a 3D-related crash on HD 4550 in over a month.
The open drivers do require a recent kernel and the mesa stack built from source (I believe there are packages for Ubuntu). They provide good OpenGL 1.5 acceleration, and GLSL is coming soon. Not as fast as fglrx yet. Tear-free XVideo. KDE4 effects work great.
There is only very basic powersaving now (and none if you use KMS). There is no decode acceleration, and likely won't be any for at least half a year, as it will be built on top of the Gallium driver, which is nowhere near ready yet.
This is the state of the open-source stack. I've never used fglrx, so I'll let other people answer that.
The open drivers do require a recent kernel and the mesa stack built from source (I believe there are packages for Ubuntu). They provide good OpenGL 1.5 acceleration, and GLSL is coming soon. Not as fast as fglrx yet. Tear-free XVideo. KDE4 effects work great.
There is only very basic powersaving now (and none if you use KMS). There is no decode acceleration, and likely won't be any for at least half a year, as it will be built on top of the Gallium driver, which is nowhere near ready yet.
This is the state of the open-source stack. I've never used fglrx, so I'll let other people answer that.
I am interested in this laptop : VAIO VGN-FW54E
It is based on Intel motherboard. Is it really a problem as it has been suggested ? Is the card enough powerfull to handle 1080p ?
Indeed, HD decode (with speed and tear free) is the main feature I am looking for. 3D performance are not that important.
Comment