Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52

Thread: Another Look At Intel's Lynnfield Linux Performance

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    214

    Default

    So, I'm confused looking at the charts there- is the i5 actually the successor to the i7 or a cheaper counterpart? If it's the cheaper counterpart, it's doing a fine job, because it's beating the i7 in a number of tests.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    466

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dashcloud View Post
    So, I'm confused looking at the charts there- is the i5 actually the successor to the i7 or a cheaper counterpart?
    Cheaper counterpart: for example, the i7 has hyperthreading, so it can run 8 threads on 4 cores, the i5 doesn't.

    In the benchmarks I've seen it's generally behind the i7 870, ahead of the i7 920 on single-threaded tasks and behind the i7 920 on multithreaded.

    Note that you can't directly compare the Intel i5 results to the i7 results in this article because they're using a different BIOS. I'll be interested to see how they do compare once Phoronix has the same configuration.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,645

    Default

    i5 and i7-8xx is for dual channel boards (currently only P55) and i7-9xx is for triple channel boards (X58). i5 has got no HT while i7 has it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Hmm their apache benchmark results are much lower than mine, can it be that ext4 is slower than ext3 here? Or is it the Intels SSD beeing lower than the OCZ vertex?
    Also their stream results are lower, i used DDR3 1333 CL7 dunno what intel used.
    Their EIST and Turbo off results are all much lower than mine, as if they ran at sub 2.66GHz.
    Beside that turbo on results look valid.
    http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...176-4674-30777

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    95

    Default

    justapost, what sort of cooling are you using? Curious about this turbo thing with the stock cooler in a closed case. Intel sending out monster coolers in the review kits is kind of questionable too, says to me "hey our stock cooling is crap, you'll have to buy something better if you want results like you see here".

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    72

    Default Benchmark result oddities

    Does anybody else find it extremely strange that a few benchmark shows about double performance improvement from enabling turbo mode which is at most ~30% increase in clock speed (nas, lame, john the ripper md5)?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,645

    Default

    Thats easy, only with good cooling and 2 cores in sleep mode the max turbo is activated. Apps which are accellerated with turbo mode use 1 core only in most cases. I don't know if there are apps with 2 threads hardcoded.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Thats easy, only with good cooling and 2 cores in sleep mode the max turbo is activated. Apps which are accellerated with turbo mode use 1 core only in most cases. I don't know if there are apps with 2 threads hardcoded.
    That's not my understanding of what I have read from the reviews. Turbo mode can be enabled anywhere from 1-4 core active, table being below for the i750 (stock/4/3/2/1)

    2.66GHz 2.80GHz 2.80GHz 3.20GHz 3.20GHz

    So it should never happen to have benchmark that produce double performance improvement from just having turbo enabled since from stock to the maximum turbo scaling possible is about 30% increase in clock speed.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Kano that's not right for Lynnfield. There's this table on Anandtech detailing Lynnfield's turbo modes.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Why does it have to be BIOS-controlled? Give us back the Turbo button or at least bring back the tacky LCD MHz readouts

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •