Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 149

Thread: Mac OS X 10.6 Brings Serious Performance Gains

  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    Btw. GPL restrictions serve community and Apples restrictions serve Apple.
    The GPL serves the FSF nothing more. Every companies contribution to the linux kernel for example serves their product.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    i think macos 10.6 is optimizes to an FBO based rendering like "Xreal" not old-style rendering like "nexuiz".
    Again, you think, and your wrong. Read the developer papers on OS X before assuming because your assumptions have no basis in fact.

    http://developer.apple.com/mac/libra...TP40008898-SW1
    Last edited by deanjo; 08-29-2009 at 12:02 PM.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Again, you think, and your wrong. Read the developer papers on OS X before assuming because your assumptions have no basis in fact.
    if you have basics you can't speak because of the NDA.

    so in fakt no BASICS is much better, than NDA!
    Last edited by Qaridarium; 08-29-2009 at 12:02 PM.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    The GPL serves the FSF nothing more. Every companies contribution to the linux kernel for example serves their product.
    Your habbit to begin flame-wars and to convert threads goes well deanjo but how convining can be someone who accepts eagerly the so restricted licenses of Microsoft and Apple when judge GPL negative?
    Last edited by Apopas; 08-29-2009 at 12:09 PM.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    How proper is for someone who accepts eagerly the so restricted licenses of Microsoft and Apple to judge GPL negative?
    As someone who has worked under all of those licenses I have every right to be negative about them. If I had my way, everything would be public domain.

    Code is nothing but a form of math. Imagine what the world would be like if someone put restrictions on the ability to add 2+2.
    Last edited by deanjo; 08-29-2009 at 12:12 PM.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    As someone who has worked under all of those licenses I have every right to be negative about them.
    It is, I just said you are not convincing by using your right. Especially you.

    If I had my way, everything would be public domain.
    With words is easy, your attitude though with the people/software/licenses which at least try to do that, says the opposite.

    Code is nothing but a form of math. Imagine what the world would be like if someone put restrictions on the ability to add 2+2.
    Oh I couldn't agree more, but that's exactly what the proprietary software, that you defend, does. Because of that they got an X bigger than OSX's one from me.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    So you mean that Michael's words should be something like:

    Well it doesn't change anything man.
    I totally disagree: it change A LOT.

    Benchmarks are welcome, but advertising and supporting Locked-in and restricted products on a site like this one, it's an absurd, IMHO.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,631

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    With words is easy, your attitude though with the people/software/licenses which at least try to do that, says the opposite.
    It's a completely unrealistic goal anyway.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    Oh I couldn't agree more, but that's exactly what the proprietary software, that you defend, does. Because of that they got an X bigger than OSX's one from me.
    And I have to disagree with you. If I put out code free of any restrictions my goal is to benefit the end user, not political agendas. If someone wants to use my code and want's to slap it in a proprietary app so be it. This philosphy has worked well for sqlite which is everywhere and the end result is everybody gains.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    And I have to disagree with you. If I put out code free of any restrictions my goal is to benefit the end user, not political agendas. If someone wants to use my code and want's to slap it in a proprietary app so be it. This philosphy has worked well for sqlite which is everywhere and the end result is everybody gains.
    So you want to benefit the end user without adding restrictions. Nice and welcome. But the restrictions your code will have when someone uses it for its proprietary app don't matter? Are they for the genearl benefit? Like that you produce much more restrictions than you intented to do when you offered the code without any at all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •