Page 7 of 25 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 243

Thread: AMD Catalyst 9.8 Delivers New Kernel Support

  1. #61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Domi09 View Post
    Does anyone have a solution for the freeze situation on FC11?
    I have installed the 9.8 driver on FC11 64-bit, it works fine until a program of mine tries to connect to the internet, pidgin for instance.
    As soon as that happens, the whole system freezes. The open source radeon driver works flawlessly though.
    I haven't found any solution for that problem. so I hope anyone of you DOES have a solution.

    Looking forward
    Really hard freezes? SysRq keys don't work anymore? If you can't get any log message, it will be hard to debug. With gentoo unstable the driver works fine so far.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    331

    Default

    OK so I tried again to get this working and succeeded after turning on a bunch of unwanted IA32 crap in the kernel (which the gentoo ebuild helpfully doesn't mention at all) and downgrading from git Xorg.

    So now I have 3D until the memory leaks force me to quit the program or suffer a crash. It feels like IE6-quality software, that's for sure.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Still "not found" in the link to the release notes. IMO just shows how much attention they pay to the Linux release. It's not the first time they don't release properly.
    Here the typical AMD ReleaseNotes PDF:
    http://www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/catalyst_98_linux.pdf

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    152

    Default

    The new randr feature works like a charm. With previous releases I had to disable randr 1.2 to be able to use dual screen.

    3D seams like a downgrade.

    Error message may appear while playing H264/VC1/mpeg2 media files with
    Hardware Acceleration
    I wonder what this really means

  5. #65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ObiWan View Post
    Here the typical AMD ReleaseNotes PDF:
    http://www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/catalyst_98_linux.pdf
    Still mention "Linux kernel 2.6 or above" as requirement.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Fedora users shouldn't complain too much

    Fedora uses a patched and ahead-of-stream graphics stack. Thus, if you are using Fedora please don't slag off the ATI team, and instead suggest to the Fedora team that be a little less cutting edge. If the Slack, Gentoo, and Arch users aren't encountering problems, it's fair to say that this is a successful release.

    I say this as a (very) patient Fedora user

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Well its good that the release notes seem to cover a lot more known issues now. Lets hope that they're working on fixing them.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yesterday View Post
    Fedora users shouldn't complain too much

    Fedora uses a patched and ahead-of-stream graphics stack. Thus, if you are using Fedora please don't slag off the ATI team, and instead suggest to the Fedora team that be a little less cutting edge. If the Slack, Gentoo, and Arch users aren't encountering problems, it's fair to say that this is a successful release.

    I say this as a (very) patient Fedora user
    I'd call this a successful release if the Ubuntu users aren't having problems.

    I don't agree with Fedora needing to be less cutting edge. I think it's fair to say that if the OSS driver eventually gets decent support across chipsets, it'll be the Fedora users the ones who'll be testing it first.

    What it is absolutely true is that Catalyst and Fedora don't mix. Fedora is constantly pushing the envelope and Catalyst is targeted to a different audience; being very popular amongst retired people living in Florida

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PuckPoltergeist View Post
    Still mention "Linux kernel 2.6 or above" as requirement.
    and it works with 2.6.29+30 without patches.

    So what is your problem?

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,788

    Default

    One thing I find funny in the release notes system requirements is "glibc 2.2 or 2.3". 2.2 was released in 2000, 2.3 in 2002.

    We're at 2.10 today (which is 2009.)

    Edit: here's another "diamond":

    "Error message may appear while playing H264/VC1/mpeg2 media files with
    Hardware Acceleration"

    Uh, wut?
    Last edited by RealNC; 08-18-2009 at 08:28 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •