Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 107 of 107

Thread: A Big Operating System Benchmark Comparison

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    I thought only about 2.6 series and about PC's. However, I have no idea why someone still wants to use 2.4 kernels

    http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/L...edded-Systems/

    Maybe they're less demanding on some devices? There's also possibility there are no reasons to migrate from 2.4 to 2.6. Btw. 2.4 performance should be much worse then 2.6 on PC's etc.
    http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Who_Uses..._Stable_Kernel

    the example I know personaly very well is DSL Linux which refuses to use kernel 2.6 because the image is a bit bigger.

  2. #102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Who_Uses..._Stable_Kernel

    the example I know personaly very well is DSL Linux which refuses to use kernel 2.6 because the image is a bit bigger.
    Oh yes. This is probably why 2.4 is chosen over 2.6 on some embedded systems.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    One day I'll reach Alaska, or die trying!
    Posts
    287

    Default

    OpenBSD? Please?

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Would be nice if you test FreeBSD + UFS and FreeBSD + ZFS..

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1c3d0g View Post
    OpenBSD? Please?
    Yes! OpenBSD benchmarks will not hurt anyone..
    If the number of operating systems become too big to a single test, phoronix can do a separated test with all the BSD variants.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    88

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Sigh, still no Plan 9.....

    Actually one thing I would kind of like to see is the wine benchmarks ran with the Linux Unified Kernel and see if there is any performance difference using it instead of wine.

    Yes! I really want to see if this makes any difference as well. The idea of a WINE kernel module really seems like it could boost performance.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Clinton Township, MI
    Posts
    21

    Default

    I am looking forward to the comparisons and appreciate whatever you are able to put together. It was some of the earlier comparisons that brought me here in the first place, so keep 'em up!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •