Here is a map to the breadbasket and centre of the universe for ya .
people live in Saskatchewan?
Heh... You're reading my remarks wrong there. It's the middleware that's the problem, not sound support on Linux. There's no way I'm going to be able to cough up $5k to pay for the license when someone uses Miles on a game I'd like to port. FMOD's got similar gotchas and IrrKlang only provides binaries for x86 and no real source code access (so you can't make IrrKlang work on Pandora, Beagleboard, Android, PRE, or Maemo- all of which could be targets now.The state of sound on Linux *sounds* pretty bad indeed. Teehee.
No kidding.PulseAudio still has issues.
All joking aside, L33F3R, I've done quite a bit more than that for the Linux community as a whole- and plan on doing more over time. Part of which was alluded to in the earlier part of the interview. Moreover, I'm one of the people that helped bring 3D acceleration support to Linux and I'm part of that group of people that brought it to the Embedded space amongst my claims to fame.
lol u have a hell of a resume no doubt.
Miles/FMOD/IrrKlang/etc. get rid of the complexity and allow you to transparently target other platforms. $5k is chump change when you consider the willingness of the MacOS community to buy MacOS titles or if you're talking Wii or PS3. You'll make that back over it all. Most indies pick FMOD or IrrKlang right at the moment because the API's really easy to pick up, has reasonably painless licensing (IrrKlang's a pay once sort of affair depending on what licensing set you choose- it's only real drawback is that they typically don't provide source for it to you, so you're stuck with what they provide. I'm targeting more than just X86 or the sound would have been IrrKlang on Caster.).
There's some FOSS solutions beginning to shape up to the same sort of thing and if needs be, I'll help make them happen. You're right on that score, we kind of need something more than what's out there.
But to characterize it as being "bad" is overstating the problem, really.
What an interesting coincidence. There's a conversation about the same subjects (viability of direct3d to opengl porting, etc) over at one thread at the official Bohemia Interactive forums, (http://forums.bistudio.com/showthrea...t=73279&page=6), which incidentally, I helped revitalize thanks to me. Over there, with the aid of one of their moderators, I started an online petition targetted at getting the most signatures as possible from the ArmA playing communities across the globe asking for a linux port of the BiA games. The petition is right here:
if anyone is interested in seeing ArmA 1 and 2, and maybe OpFlaspoint 1 native clients.
But going back on topic, I think Svartalf and many others here like DragonLord would like to comment on the remarks being said on that thread, specially from members Hoak and miyalrdo.
You know, something just occured to me.
Is this the reason why Carmack and developers are losing interest in native Linux clients? I remember that with Quake Wars, I waited until I had the client sitting in my home folder to buy the game, but other people just went ahead and bought the game and ran it under wine. Heck, some people will just run the game under wine regardless of a native client. Just looks at Steam and Valve... How many linux gamers are under the mercy of the developers?Originally Posted by Svartalf
Is it in our best interests to refrain from buying, or giving any attention, to games that offer no native linux client, and only consider games that do offer a native client?
I like to think of that a man with a PS3 won't go out and buy 360 games, or vice versa.