Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: X.Org 7.5 Release Schedule Revised For July

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,567

    Default X.Org 7.5 Release Schedule Revised For July

    Phoronix: X.Org 7.5 Release Schedule Revised For July

    X.Org 7.5 with the X Server 1.7 release was planned for release at the start of this month, but sadly they far from made it -- no test releases of the new X Server are even available yet. Though after reading Phoronix, Daniel Stone remembered this release schedule and has decided to give another try at X.Org 7.5...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzIzMg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,123

    Default

    I've heard that Xserver 1.7 has EXA improvements that are especially beneficial for KDE4. Does anyone know sth. about it or other EXA improvements made? And if this was true, do DDX drivers have to adopt those changes or does it work with just upgrading the Xserver?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    435

    Default

    It's frequently mentioned here that X.Org releases are always behind schedule. It almost feels like you're picking on them! I'm sure there are plenty of other high profile projects that are even more behind schedule. I only mention this because if it weren't for Phoronix, I wouldn't even notice. I am really looking forward to MPX but I don't mind waiting if it means getting things right. Have patience!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,425

    Default

    I think the problem is that xorg releases have schedules, unlike most of the other projects

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Maybe they should use nVidia's tactic of releasing "beta" versions every 48-96 hours. It seems to fool the right people...

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chewi View Post
    It's frequently mentioned here that X.Org releases are always behind schedule. It almost feels like you're picking on them!
    It's not a matter at all of "picking on them", but to draw attention to the problem at hand so that hopefully it gets corrected. For such a critical piece of a free software ecosystem, to have their release schedule be easily thrown off by months easily and the lack of communication that takes place, it's a problem. If the GNOME 2.26 or Linux 2.6.29 release schedules had went off severely and were unannounced, distribution vendors, users, and other stakeholders would likely have a fit. Heck, remember Ubuntu 8.04 LTS shipping with an X Server release candidate?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Ubuntu 8.04 LTS also has mplayer 1.0 RC2, and unreleased ffmpeg. Of course these projects aren't as important as X.Org or Linux kernel.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    /dev/random
    Posts
    218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mithrandir View Post
    Ubuntu 8.04 LTS also has mplayer 1.0 RC2, and unreleased ffmpeg. Of course these projects aren't as important as X.Org or Linux kernel.
    Maplyer and ffmpeg never have releases

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    i know it's almost never right to throw money at a problem, but i think we should all donate a few bucks to these people. i know their problem is mainly man power though.... money should increase some motivation at least. or we could donate a little when the release comes out

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by portets43 View Post
    i know it's almost never right to throw money at a problem, but i think we should all donate a few bucks to these people. i know their problem is mainly man power though.... money should increase some motivation at least. or we could donate a little when the release comes out
    A while ago I talked to some developers about offering up a bounty if they can release on schedule, but they didn't seem to be interested. Granted, most of these developers are already paid to work on X full-time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •