Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 105

Thread: A Battle For Good Open-Source Game Graphics?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,793

    Default A Battle For Good Open-Source Game Graphics?

    Phoronix: A Battle For Good Open-Source Game Graphics?

    An area where open-source games have traditionally lacked is with regard to delivering high-end graphics capabilities that can compete with modern day commercial games. To this day, many open-source games still look like something that would have been pushed out of a commercial game studio years ago due to lacking proper artwork and a game engine that has an OpenGL renderer that can sustain delivering impressive graphical features with modern hardware...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzIzMQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    113

    Default

    I just want to throw in my 2 cents:
    Enough with the fancy graphics; lets see some gameplay effecting physics.
    Remember how in the Crysis demo you can take a jeep, drive it into a building, the building collapes, then you back up into a tree and it falls down too? I want to see more of that on a larger scale.
    We already have a commercial quality open source physics engine and with graphic hardware far exceeding the requirements of most open source titles, performance shouldn't be a problem.
    I mean, look at warmonger if you need inspiration.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    id Tech 4 is supposed to see a GPL release this year (at least that's what Carmack said in August '08). That might be a nice shot in the arm for open-source gaming technology.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    92

    Default

    I think a big bottleneck for open source games is not even as much having the engine as it is having large communities of people who can actually build content for said engines.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,132

    Default

    The new Sauerbraten release is scheduled for next week (the week after if there's a problem). You should definitly check that one out then!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,103

    Default

    Why is everyone so focused on graphics. I'd dump crysis any day for a game that has both great gameplay and a great story.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6

    Default

    As a developer for the GNU GPL game Warzone 2100 (which was originally developed and released by Pumpkin Studios in 1999 before they were disbanded; released under the GNU GPL in 2004) the problem is not so much updating the engine but rather finding artists to make content for it.

    You'd be surprised how much can be done with pure brute force -- high resolution textures, high poly models and some blending. Take the new terrain renderer in Warzone 2100 for example:

    Old: http://developer.wz2100.net/attachme...d-sensors.jpeg
    New: http://developer.wz2100.net/attachme...ew-terrain.jpg

    The hardest part was getting the textures themselves (namely under a compatible license). Finding people to remake the in-game models is even more difficult.

    Sadly things such as support for shaders is not a valid metric to compare game engines by. Adding a pair of fragment/vertex shaders to emulate the fixed-function pipeline is not difficult and has the bonus that it allows you to claim support for shaders. Hardly a useful application, however. Doing something productive and inventive with a shader is much more difficult. Integrating it into an old game even more so.

    Regards, Freddie.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    89

    Default

    There's either two things they can do, make Myst/Broken Sword/Fallout-like games, or make Crysis/HL2-like games. Both of these options would make for amazing games, graphics or not, but they also need a real (big) team of people working hard.

    Here's what I don't get, though. There are LOADS of 'mod teams' out there, many of them making truly amazing addons for commercial games that could sell as standalone games in their own right. The community is there - it just doesn't know about open source games, or isn't interested.

    How come there's no shortage of people for open source projects like IP telephone servers, enterprise middleware, business intelligence, enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management (because when I see those categories I think boring, boring, boring!), but so few to help out with the games?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    /dev/random
    Posts
    218

    Default

    I don't really think the engines are the problem, the problem seems that the engine makes all these nice particle effects, but the models and artwork are the problem. You can't have a nice looking game without nice models. Nexuiz seems to have mostly solved that except for the player models. Saurbraten, Alien Arena, etc. really need to do a lot of work here. OpenArena is pretty much a q3 clone, which is it's goal, so it's not really possible to complain.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    332

    Default

    why does nobody ever mention the blender game engine?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •