Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: IBM Buying Sun?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    102

    Default

    or HP ... "HP Invent"? (Unless you happen to work from them in design, then you find out that you don't have a job because HP no longer do R&D)

    IBM was gonna be a sound owner to ride out the recession ... Even though I'd prefer an independent Sun (which aint gonna happen under the Shwartzeneger!)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    89

    Default

    My only vision of IBM buying them consists of IBM forking future development of all the interesting Solaris bits (ZFS, DTrace, Crossbow, etc etc) into AIX under their proprietary license and leaving the current versions to rot. Oh, and cancelling Rock and kicking all the architects to the street.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    102

    Default

    I'm not sure, but then I'm an Optimist and always have been.

    I still reckon some of the R&D in Rock could be used, even if Rock is dead. Assuming that IBM will keep PowerPC.

    I'd like to think they'll still support Solaris (It'd be difficult to stop OpenSolaris now) I'm not sure if they have the ability to re license all the technology in OpenSolaris, but the Sun license isn't incompatible with AIX ...

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joffe View Post
    My only vision of IBM buying them consists of IBM forking future development of all the interesting Solaris bits (ZFS, DTrace, Crossbow, etc etc) into AIX under their proprietary license and leaving the current versions to rot. Oh, and cancelling Rock and kicking all the architects to the street.
    IBM is great contributor to Linux kernel, so I hope they will just release ZFS and DTrace under GPL (rest is not so interesting). Btw. BTRFS and Linux performance counters are coming so ZFS is becoming much less interesting too...

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    I hope that IBM made another offer to purchase SUN.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    BTRFS and Linux performance counters are coming so ZFS is becoming much less interesting too...
    BTRFS. ZFS.
    Coming. Working.
    Not here. Here.

    For something with requirements as bulletproof as a filesystem, this is really a huge chasm of difference... :/

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,070

    Default

    Someone mentioned Apple. Now that would be something... Just imagine Sparc Macs touting ZFS.

  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyatt View Post
    BTRFS. ZFS.
    Coming. Working.
    Not here. Here.

    For something with requirements as bulletproof as a filesystem, this is really a huge chasm of difference... :/
    Not exactly Linux doesn't have native ZFS support :>

    Someone mentioned Apple. Now that would be something... Just imagine Sparc Macs touting ZFS.
    Do macs even support sparcs?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    Not exactly Linux doesn't have native ZFS support :>
    But it is easier to change the license to GPL (if IBM buys SUN) than write the whole Btrfs File System!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Heh, noticed today that Sun stocks are down ~25% since walking away. Nothing like throwing away a quarter of your value.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •