AMD gets beaten by NVidia, any plans?

[monraaf]

LMAO, uhhuh, meanwhile your consuming 68.4 watts websurfing and desktop stuff while the GTX 280 is consuming 43.7 watts doing the same task.

Well, for me these are both ridiculous high numbers. Has AMD or Nvidia actually a working solution on Linux where you can use such a high end card in combination with an IGP where the total graphics power consumption is less than 10 watt during normal desktop usage just doing a framebuffer refresh?

[kraftman]

Please read again what jonnycat26 post before. I don't thinks that's what he means.

Alright, it's not so important.



I'm happy with the newest catalyst driver - if I don't 'touch' it it works. When AMD will really improve video playback and stability their drivers should be as good as Nvidia. I hope this happen in few months.

[Moronix]

For the love of zeus, who gives a crap about cuda! It's running in software for your games.

[deanjo]

For the love of zeus, who gives a crap about cuda! It's running in software for your games.

Quite a few people care about GPGPU, personally for me it's more a concern then gaming in linux.

[gsmd]

Just to make it more painful

http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?t=45525

[energyman]

Quite a few people care about GPGPU, personally for me it's more a concern then gaming in linux.

anmd gpgpu works just fine with STREAM.

btw, nvidia fanboys:
intel just sued nvidia about nehalem chipsets. This will be funny to watch.

[RealNC]

anmd gpgpu works just fine with STREAM.

You're getting boring. Circles. Again and again. Read what other write for a change.

[energyman]

and i replied to deanjo. So shut up.

[RealNC]

You're trolling, not just replying.

[energyman]

says the person who started this thread with a troll post and has since then done nothing else.

Cattle, pot, black...