Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Internet Explorer or Firefox?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3

    Default Internet Explorer or Firefox?

    There is such a thing as battle of the search engines, so there should be a battler of the Web Browsers.

    Which is better Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saluta View Post
    Which is better Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox?
    Your kidding right?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    158

    Default

    You're not likely to stir up any controversy on that question here. This is a Linux news site.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,132

    Default

    Internet Explorer. It is more secure, faster, has better support for extensions, and has a lot of updates and runs on any operating system (by Microsoft)!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    89

    Default

    I've used IE about three times the last few years, all cases of reformatting and using it to access 'firefox.com'.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    Internet Explorer. It is more secure, faster, has better support for extensions, and has a lot of updates and runs on any operating system (by Microsoft)!
    I agree.

    Internet Explorer is what is installed by default on my Linux system. Why should I want to use something else?

    It's faster, it has a much better security track record, it's open source, it has all sorts of lovely extensions... A whole army of programmers mucking around with it and extending in unique and interesting ways.

    Not to also mention that Internet Explorer is completely open source. Love it.

    Firefox, meanwhile, I will install it into other people's Linux systems if they have need for it; for whatever reason. Usually some old Firefox-only website in a corporate network. I'll use a script called IEs4Linux (which is a odd name for a Firefox-installer script) that will automate the download and installation of Firefox on Linux.

    But, of course, this doesn't work if your using a non-x86 platform.. like ARM or PowerPC. Then it's IE-only for sure. But that's unusual for a desktop system to be non-x86.


    Besides being much more compatible, better support of web standards, being open source, and provided natively by the operating sysetm that I prefer (for lots of reasons I won't go into), IE's new improvements are creating a vastly better performing browser then what Microsoft provides with Firefox.

    For Javascript performance, benchmarks has shown that with IE's Tracemonkey it is able to perform 5 times as fast as compared to Firefox 8 prerelease and 15 times faster then the currently available Firefox 7.

    I don't have anything against people that would prefer to use Firefox for whatever reason, but by now it should be obvious why I'll stick with IE for the time being.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drag View Post
    I agree.

    Internet Explorer is what is installed by default on my Linux system. Why should I want to use something else?

    It's faster, it has a much better security track record, it's open source, it has all sorts of lovely extensions... A whole army of programmers mucking around with it and extending in unique and interesting ways.

    Not to also mention that Internet Explorer is completely open source. Love it.

    Firefox, meanwhile, I will install it into other people's Linux systems if they have need for it; for whatever reason. Usually some old Firefox-only website in a corporate network. I'll use a script called IEs4Linux (which is a odd name for a Firefox-installer script) that will automate the download and installation of Firefox on Linux.

    But, of course, this doesn't work if your using a non-x86 platform.. like ARM or PowerPC. Then it's IE-only for sure. But that's unusual for a desktop system to be non-x86.


    Besides being much more compatible, better support of web standards, being open source, and provided natively by the operating sysetm that I prefer (for lots of reasons I won't go into), IE's new improvements are creating a vastly better performing browser then what Microsoft provides with Firefox.

    For Javascript performance, benchmarks has shown that with IE's Tracemonkey it is able to perform 5 times as fast as compared to Firefox 8 prerelease and 15 times faster then the currently available Firefox 7.

    I don't have anything against people that would prefer to use Firefox for whatever reason, but by now it should be obvious why I'll stick with IE for the time being.
    You forgot IE gets you laid more too.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    You forgot IE gets you laid more too.
    Don't type such things or ppl really might believe that ;-)
    Last edited by Tares; 11-15-2008 at 06:29 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    You forgot IE gets you laid more too.
    We all know very well that linux users do not get laid. Ever.

    But as was already mentioned, IE should be the obvious choice of browser.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3

    Default

    i was an IE user befor but my freinds reccomend firefox, i dont actually know the difference, but they say its better, so now im using it ^^,

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •