Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: Wayland: A New X Server For Linux

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cruiseoveride View Post
    X11 has been around for over 20years.

    Heck! Ati might even have stable drivers out for X by then, and thats a long time.

    no, that's like expecting to see your turtle jump.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    138

    Default Regressions galore, old card rendered unusable

    Re-writing X will mean that old cards will become unsupported even though they may be plenty capable. No one will bother to port drivers for old cards, so distros will be forced to ship both classic X and Wayland, using up space on installation CDs.

    Making incremental increases to X is preferrable because the breakage to old cards is minimal, and old drivers automatically benefit from optimizations to the framework.

    Kristian Hogsberg seems to be a talented engineer, but let's not forget he also started and then abandoned the new Linux kernel firewire stack, which after FOUR years still doesn't work with any userland multimedia libraries for streaming video from web cams and cable boxes.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North Carolina, US
    Posts
    9

    Default

    From the sound of it this doesn't seem like an X replacement for Xorg, but a replacement of all X. X does have some nifty things, like being able to tunnel (okay, that's about it).

    But having a replacement which can make assumptions it holds to be true (kernel is responsible for X) would make the process a lot easier. But can't most of this already be done with DRI2/gallium and XCB?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    So far this seems to be an experimental project, Implementing some of what X does but without the baggage of 20+ years. As a result much of it will be more optimised to what today's graphics tech is capable. Also in removing the cruft from X means that the server itself is tiny and embeddable. It will never replace X

    It looks as if it will only work with open drivers, If it ever enters into a usable state.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Interesting.. to say the least.
    I just skimmed the article, but apparently this cannot be used for a normal desktop like KDE or GNOME right?
    And also, what will happen to owners of old cards? Like for example Rage, R128, and those.. As far as I can see, they still have drivers for X.org, and these aren't exactly the cards you should be running COmpiz with

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    681

    Default

    Sound nice but what is with DRI2 ? has Kristian Høgsberg finish it ? or why he start a new Project ?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    900

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ex-Cyber View Post
    As far as I can tell, Wayland is not an X server at all, but rather implements its own (currently incomplete and experimental) protocol. The only mentions I see of X are in the sense of running an X server on top of Wayland.
    My thoughts exactly... Actually when I finished reading the article I couldn't help but rename the article in my mind to something slightly different: Wayland: Quartz for Linux...

    For those who don't know, Quartz is the display management system in OS X (soon to be replaced in OS 10.6, apparently), and is the one responsible for MacOS's pretty, snappy and composited graphics. IIRC Cocoa is the equivalent to Xinput and also implements part of the UI (Aqua being the actual tool-kit). I'm not too familiar with the whole graphics affair on MacOS beyond that.

    Oh, and for those asking about the license, being this most likely a project sponsored by Red Hat, you can rest assured that it will use an open license, most surely GPL.
    Last edited by Thetargos; 11-03-2008 at 09:26 PM.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stan View Post
    Re-writing X will mean that old cards will become unsupported even though they may be plenty capable. No one will bother to port drivers for old cards, so distros will be forced to ship both classic X and Wayland, using up space on installation CDs.

    Making incremental increases to X is preferrable because the breakage to old cards is minimal, and old drivers automatically benefit from optimizations to the framework.
    Why do you care about old cards?

    I say forget old cards and here is why. Wayland will not be replacing X, not within the next 10-20 years at least. New cards will be the old cards and old cards, well, you won't see many of them. Doing this will make it hard to get a user-base for the first 10 years, but if done right the payoff will be great. This is the only way to beat X; from the sound if it that is not the goal.

    Note that, to replace X would not mean X has died or is unused.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thetargos View Post
    My thoughts exactly... Actually when I finished reading the article I couldn't help but rename the article in my mind to something slightly different: Wayland: Quartz for Linux...

    For those who don't know, Quartz is the display management system in OS X (soon to be replaced in OS 10.6, apparently), and is the one responsible for MacOS's pretty, snappy and composited graphics. IIRC Cocoa is the equivalent to Xinput and also implements part of the UI (Aqua being the actual tool-kit). I'm not too familiar with the whole graphics affair on MacOS beyond that.

    Oh, and for those asking about the license, being this most likely a project sponsored by Red Hat, you can rest assured that it will use an open license, most surely GPL.
    Whoa boy...

    Quartz is a compositor and it is not going anywhere. Upgraded perhaps but not being replaced. It's roughly the OS X equivalent to xorg

    Cocoa is a framework much like QT / GTK. There is also Carbon but finally they are killing that ugly sucker in 10.6

    Aqua is the desktop the linux equivalent to KDE or Gnome.

    You can find more in depth explanations here:

    http://developer.apple.com/documenta...1067-CH273-SW5

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North Carolina, US
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thetargos View Post
    Actually when I finished reading the article I couldn't help but rename the article in my mind to something slightly different: Wayland: Quartz for Linux...
    Glad to know I'm not the only one who did that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •