Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 58

Thread: LinuxGames has a QuakeCon recap...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MN, United States
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    By the by, I suspect they might actually care. There's a lot of people honestly looking for a better answer- Vista's NOT it and it's putting a big bar towards new machine sales, with people trying to figure out ways of getting XP or looking at "that there Linux thing" (yes...I've fielded LOTS of answers to people lately about it...). They're looking for a way out of the mill MS has set up for everyone. If you could show them that the cool games they're buying right now could be actually moved over and be supported on Linux, they'd be very interested in many cases. Don't let the leet crap going on in forums like [H]ardOCP and elsewhere fool you. If we could have a viable gamer space going on right now, you'd see a LOT of people make the jump because they see what Linux brings to the table. Right now, we don't have one- because of some of what deanjo commented on as perceptions, and every bit of what I commented on as perceptions (and to some extent, reality...)
    Yeah thats true.. I guess I just got a sour taste in my mouth lately due to the latest events and its just kinda gotten to me. Sorry guys, but yeah you're right, the game would need to be very kick ass, which could be done, but it would take a hell of a commitment and I don't know how many guys out there would be willing to make such a commitment for free. Probably not as many as we hope.

    But as far as what you're saying about people coming over, yeah, even Wine could partially pull it off to some degree if it could just run some of those games flawlessly, but Wine just isn't a overall solution, its more of a bandaid. I do know exactly what you're talking about though, I've read some Windows gaming forums here and there throughout the months and I see people all the time saying that they would be willing to depart from Windows if they could just get their favorite games, alot of people were saying they wanted Team Fortress 2/Steam then they would. But I don't think that whole Steam coming to Linux thing/rumor is really working out as well as we would had hoped.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malikith View Post
    Yeah thats true.. I guess I just got a sour taste in my mouth lately due to the latest events and its just kinda gotten to me. Sorry guys, but yeah you're right, the game would need to be very kick ass, which could be done, but it would take a hell of a commitment and I don't know how many guys out there would be willing to make such a commitment for free. Probably not as many as we hope.
    Well, there are various teams trying to build games for Linux, but almost all of them are encountering the same problem: Not enough arty people. Technically they can compete, but on the art front they struggle. Looking at the successful open source Linux games, what you see is that they tend to for "cult" style art, and I believe even there, some of them are using professionally done, paid for, art.

    What Linux gaming needs if it really want to go that route is people in the Universities which offer Computer Game Design degrees....

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MN, United States
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobbieAB View Post
    Well, there are various teams trying to build games for Linux, but almost all of them are encountering the same problem: Not enough arty people. Technically they can compete, but on the art front they struggle. Looking at the successful open source Linux games, what you see is that they tend to for "cult" style art, and I believe even there, some of them are using professionally done, paid for, art.

    What Linux gaming needs if it really want to go that route is people in the Universities which offer Computer Game Design degrees....
    Yeah definitely, I think the weakest link of all this art related stuff is 3d modeling. Good 3d modelers are really really hard to find. Level designers and programmers though are very easy to find. The easiest would probably be level designers when you're speaking of Quake based games. I would fall into the level designer category myself since I have a few years of experience of dealing with GTK Radiant (Been messing with it off and on since 2002 and know how to do pretty much everything there is in Radiant). If I'm considered a level designer, I'm sure everyone and their mother is too.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malikith View Post
    What we need to do is create a cool but simple open source game that can rival the industries best on every front.
    ...
    I also think the game would have to be Linux and Mac only. If Windows was supported and the game became popular it wouldn't matter if it supported Linux or Mac.
    How would you accomplish this? Windows isn't void of open source coders, and there's plenty of Linux coders that aim for the ultimate in portability. Even if the end product itself doesn't support Windows, as long as the source is available you can be sure someone will port it there.

    But I tend to agree with Dragonlord on this. Let it run on Windows, but make sure it's clearly "developed for Linux".

    Someone mentioned asking Mark Shuttleworth/Canonical to fund such game development. I think that might be a good starting point, but we could also ask companies behind other distributions.. or hell, maybe even IBM, if they want to pitch in. Such a game doesn't have to be free, either. Even if the code was open source/GPL, there's nothing stopping you from selling it for money. Plus if you put the art/media assets under a non-free license, people would still have to buy it to legally get the full game.

    Then if such a game is a success, we can start funding more games, and paying other developers/publishers to port their games to Linux as well.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    833

    Default

    @Malikith:

    I have to disagree there. Getting by good coders is hard since most of them do their own thing. 3D modelers are also not the biggest problem to get by. Most troubles are int he 2D department and mapping. Also the quality of course. The good people are often snagged away buy Windows only projects leaving half-hearted people for the other projects which have a good idea and dedicated people but none with the top-notch skills required. Would help if projects could be narrowed down and people clogging into them instead of distributing them over a lot of projects ending up with project teams of a couple of people most of which are not artsy enough.

    EDIT: got race-posted ... so much for not locking the Mutex

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    906

    Default

    Art-wise, the main problem (besides modeling, for which Blender is a God-send) are textures and sounds (effects and music). We have the necessary tools to create good stuff on Linux, we just lack the people (it would seem) to do it in the Open Source model.

    Here's a wild thought... There are common interests among and across the different distributions for gaming. Open source and free gaming. Why not bring these people together on board to such an effort like this? Lemme explain myself:

    • Different distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Fedora, etc) have people interested in and some times even projects dedicated to games. Fedora calls these SIGs (Special Interest Groups).
    • These people work on many aspects of the games for the different distributions (package, build, patch, etc).
    • Since what is lacking the most for generating open source games seem to be art-related people, why not ask people in the art teams of these different distributions and bring them together to a common project? Then, the most critical element missing would be the idea itself for such a game and its type (Action, Adventure, Puzzle, RTS, etc)


    The bulk of the work in a game, besides the evident technical problems, seem to be precisely the art-related stuff. And even then there seem to be a lot of people dedicated at seemingly the same tasks (but not necessarily). Take 3D model generation, for example. A person could be a very good modeler, but a lousy mapper (map textures to the actual model), so two different people may be required to work on the same model for finalizing it. The same may apply for textures, where different persons can work on different textures (for example on is better generating furniture and building masks, and other is better at plants and outdoors). The most frequently requested talent for mods and other free games are artists, and since the different distributions have art teams comprised of volunteers, why not check with them if they'd be willing to participate in an open game?

    Sorry for the thread hijack... I had created a thread for precisely these kinds of discussions a while back.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlord View Post
    @Malikith:

    I have to disagree there. Getting by good coders is hard since most of them do their own thing. 3D modelers are also not the biggest problem to get by. Most troubles are int he 2D department and mapping. Also the quality of course. The good people are often snagged away buy Windows only projects leaving half-hearted people for the other projects which have a good idea and dedicated people but none with the top-notch skills required. Would help if projects could be narrowed down and people clogging into them instead of distributing them over a lot of projects ending up with project teams of a couple of people most of which are not artsy enough.

    EDIT: got race-posted ... so much for not locking the Mutex
    Again, the versions I heard was that it was getting consistent artwork of a decent standard across the entire project. Textures, cut scenes, video clips, music...

    These are graphic design skills, NOT computer nerd skills, and it is getting those across a large project that is hard. The games companies can manage it because they PAY their teams doing it.

    Engines? Sure, it's a coding challenge. Modelling? Again, close enough to the coding. Consistent game theme and feel, blending in sound, getting the pacing just right? Face it, most programers can't even begin to to that side of it.

    Take Battle of Wesnoth. It's managed to achieve a consistent feel. It adopted it's own look, and the graphics and themeing are consistent, though very simple. I believe they STILL had to pay for some of the artwork, though it was mostly on a private basis, and not project wide. Now imagine a game where the themeing is more complex and bigger in scope? Are you really trying to claim that a bunch of amateurs (which is how most Open Source stuff is done) are going to be able to cope with the challenge in their free time? Vegastrike shows they have serious problems with it...

    EDIT: Damn that not locking the mutex...
    Last edited by RobbieAB; 08-18-2008 at 04:25 PM.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MN, United States
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    How would you accomplish this? Windows isn't void of open source coders, and there's plenty of Linux coders that aim for the ultimate in portability. Even if the end product itself doesn't support Windows, as long as the source is available you can be sure someone will port it there.

    But I tend to agree with Dragonlord on this. Let it run on Windows, but make sure it's clearly "developed for Linux".

    Someone mentioned asking Mark Shuttleworth/Canonical to fund such game development. I think that might be a good starting point, but we could also ask companies behind other distributions.. or hell, maybe even IBM, if they want to pitch in. Such a game doesn't have to be free, either. Even if the code was open source/GPL, there's nothing stopping you from selling it for money. Plus if you put the art/media assets under a non-free license, people would still have to buy it to legally get the full game.

    Then if such a game is a success, we can start funding more games, and paying other developers/publishers to port their games to Linux as well.
    Yeah, you could have LGP or something actually make a game even though they just do ports/publish it might prove for at the very least an interesting discussion for them.

    My whole point about having a game be Linux/Mac only was just a idea to fight fire with fire. But maybe it would make sense to Windows users to see a runs best on Linux thing or something on it right on the main menu down in the right corner or something. I just think about alot of the Windows users I see on these Windows hardware forums that are so closed minded and how ignorant they are. It just makes me feel like they wouldn't even look at the logo. Thats really where I was coming from on that. I guess you can't say they won't, but you really can't say they will either.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlord View Post
    @Malikith:

    I have to disagree there. Getting by good coders is hard since most of them do their own thing. 3D modelers are also not the biggest problem to get by. Most troubles are int he 2D department and mapping. Also the quality of course. The good people are often snagged away buy Windows only projects leaving half-hearted people for the other projects which have a good idea and dedicated people but none with the top-notch skills required. Would help if projects could be narrowed down and people clogging into them instead of distributing them over a lot of projects ending up with project teams of a couple of people most of which are not artsy enough.

    EDIT: got race-posted ... so much for not locking the Mutex
    Now here I disagree with you and heres why, lets look at all the open source and free games out there that support Linux. Heres some of the more recent examples, Tremulous, Warsow, World of Padman, Frozen Bubble 2, Urban Terror, all these games have pretty good coding (mostly ioquake3 games but they do have to do some Quake C for sure), but how many of these games actually have really high quality art, well.. World of Padman does, Frozen Bubble 2 does, and Warsow has some good art too.

    Warsow though has some good coding as well since they really did rework that Quake 2 engine to death. And without programmers/scripters, well, none of these games would exist. So I think its safe to say theres plenty of "good enough" programmers out there, hell, look around. I mean theres good stuff everywhere I look in the open source world. I can't say I see GREAT artwork all the time though when it comes to Open Source games.

    You can have 5000 John Carmacks but if you don't have the artists your project won't go anywhere, it'll just be a engine not a game. So I think its safe to say you just need programmers that are "good enough". Which theres quite a few of those. Sure you could find a crappy modeler anywhere, but if your game doesn't look very good, not really anyone is gonna want to play it even if you are John Carmack himself doing the programming.

    Mappers are in abundance though, everytime I look at what projects are looking for are usually modelers or a programmer. They are usually full of level designers. Guys that do textures and stuff though can be hard to find too though, I will agree with you there.
    Last edited by Malikith; 08-18-2008 at 04:34 PM.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    833

    Default

    @RobbieAB:
    You got to it first. I wanted to mention the lack of consistency myself. It's one thing to have different people work on the same models or map but the main problem is to get it consistent. Successful mod teams have members sticking to the project for long enough to have a consistent look and feel.

    @Malikith:
    I'm basing my opinion on the observations in the modding scene. This is also free game making in that the mods itself are free to play but not necessary the code. There the situation is that most projects lack coders first then mappers or modelers. Chances are in the indie scene this is the other way 'round but this is how I observe the situation.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobbieAB View Post
    Now imagine a game where the themeing is more complex and bigger in scope? Are you really trying to claim that a bunch of amateurs (which is how most Open Source stuff is done) are going to be able to cope with the challenge in their free time? Vegastrike shows they have serious problems with it...
    Heh... They can do it. But it's a hit-or-miss proposition, RobbieAB. I can manage passable stuff myself- but I'm better at coding than I am at graphic arts stuff. This is the story for most people and is at least part of the source of woe for Vegastrike But, groups like the World of Padman team, the Tremulous team, and a few others show that it's doable all the same. It's just that it's...very difficult...to find people with the level of dedication to do that level of work that aren't already tied up with closed projects in a way that they couldn't help even if they wanted to.

    EDIT: Damn that not locking the mutex...
    At least you guys know what a mutex is FOR... I know of places (not naming names, no...) that part of the development team think declaring something "volatile" makes operations on int values atomic on at least x86 machines- and mutexes are 'too painful to use'.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •